[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Chester wind turbine faces uphill battle 

Credit:  By John Sakata, Berkshire Eagle Staff, January 12, 2013 | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

CHESTER – A wind turbine is, again, being explored in Chester, but similar to two other failed attempts, the prospective location could face formidable challenges to its construction.

It’s being considered for land owned by Chester in the town of Becket – and Becket has very strict rules governing the construction of large-scale wind turbines.

This time, the renewable energy company First Wind is examining wind turbine construction. Chester has twice previously explored a wind turbine, Electric Light Commissioner Gene Bishop said, but has no funds invested in this project – although town officials are watching the development with interest.

In September 2012, First Wind erected a sizable meteorological tower on Chester-owned property within Becket’s borders.

Even if the location proves to be a good spot for wind energy, construction is in limbo before it begins. The Becket Planning Board has designated a subcommittee to review the already-strict bylaws governing large wind turbines in town and possibly strengthen a nearly impregnable set of rules.

Director of Corporate Communications John Lamontagne, of First Wind, stated in an e-mail that the plans are in a preliminary phase and that the meteorological tower would simply gather wind data in the area for one to two years. The height of the proposed wind turbine was not disclosed.

Becket provided a permit for the construction of the meteorological tower and could take additional action after creating a subcommittee to review the wind turbine bylaws.

“If any studies show the effect is harmful to humans then the townspeople would probably tighten the bylaw and make it more stringent,” Becket Planning Board member Bob Roziano said. “It’s already restrictive as is.”

Becket’s zoning bylaws regulating 200-foot wind turbines include an extensive list of rules. A special permit would be needed from the town. There are extensive layers of reporting required on noise and sound. An analysis on avian and bat species would have to be conducted by an independent wildlife biologist. There is also an annual limit of 30 hours of shadows, or flicker, on any off-site inhabitied building or undeveloped lot.

The bylaw also allows for more restrictions. Additional restrictions can be imparted in the town’s special permit.

“The bylaw is very, very restrictive,” Roziano said. “It puts so much restriction on developers, some people would say it’s almost impossible for anyone or [an] entity to be able to put [up] a large-scale wind turbine.”

This will be the third attempt in about six years to develop a wind energy project on the Chester-owned land within Becket, Bishop said. The first attempt was done at a site about a quarter-mile from the current testing location, but the topography blocked the wind, he said.

That plan was abandoned because the location failed to produce enough electricity over its lifespan to be profitable, he said.

There was another town attempt to build on Blandford Road near the Blandford town line, but the privately owned property was too expensive.

In this latest effort, Bishop said that the town’s role could be relegated to providing electricity lines to a future wind turbine, but he also said the town could engage in a more robust role.

Whether this turbine comes to pass is wait-and-see.

“Whether they will meet these requirements will determine once the hearings [start],” Roziano said.

Source:  By John Sakata, Berkshire Eagle Staff, January 12, 2013 | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky