[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Pomfret board discusses wind tower law  

Credit:  By SHIRLEY PULAWSKI - OBSERVER Staff Writer , The OBSERVER | January 7, 2013 | www.observertoday.com ~~

Revisions to Pomfret’s 2007 local law regarding non-commercial small wind towers are under way.

Wind energy conversion systems, or WECS, were a topic of discussion at a recent town board workshop meeting.

Town Attorney Jeffrey Passafaro explained the board would need to “define what is small” and work through the existing code piece by piece.

Passafaro explained technology has changed making smaller units capable of producing larger amounts of energy, and the board felt the current law is inadequate to address newer units.

The current code is written to address commercial wind installations and has a subsection which outlines small WECS for individual use.

While the board is in preliminary stages of redeveloping the code, much of the remaining law will remain intact, such as the limitation to one WECS per lot. Setback distances from roads and utilities appear unlikely to change, although new wording may be more inclusive of utilities, buildings and roads. A minimum of 500 feet is currently the required distance from roads.

Areas which are being addressed include “nameplate capacity” or the greatest amount of energy a unit is rated to produce under full operating conditions. The current law allows for up to 65 kW nameplate capacity, but the board is considering expanding that capacity to 100 kW.

Passafaro told board members they must decide to select language that either specifically allows WECS in certain districts, or specifically excludes WECS from certain districts. In the former case, residents would be able to request a use variance, but not in the latter case. They must also decide whether the residents will have to come to the board or the zoning board of appeals to request a variance. The current law requires an appeal to be filed with the town board.

Areas already designated as conservation districts will not likely be considered for WECS development by the board, according to Supervisor Donald Steger, who pointed those areas out to members on a map of the town.

The current WECS height allowed is 65 feet, but board members are considering raising that to 100 feet for certain acreages. A distance of one and one-half times the height is required for a fall zone within the resident’s property line, and must also conform with setback distances. Lots consisting of over five acres of land may be eligible for taller towers, possibly up to 150 feet.

Also under consideration is the minimum lot size. Currently, a resident must have at least one acre of land to install a small WECS, but Passafaro told the board a minimum of two acres is a safer limitation.

Much discussion focused on the distance a tower must be placed from other existing homes, but no consensus was developed at the meeting.

The board will revisit the topic at later meetings before revising the local law.

Source:  By SHIRLEY PULAWSKI - OBSERVER Staff Writer , The OBSERVER | January 7, 2013 | www.observertoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: