LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New moves on Northumberland wind farm plans 

Credit:  by David Black, The Journal | Dec 31 2012 | www.journallive.co.uk ~~

Moves to force energy companies to invest significantly more money into community benefits in return for wind farm approvals have been dismissed by anti-turbine campaigners in the region.

Reports at the weekend claimed rural communities affected by wind farm proposals could receive millions of pounds in compensation from the developers – under new Government plans to limit the scale of public opposition to the controversial schemes.

It is claimed the plans – which have been branded “bribes for blight” by some critics – could see the enhanced benefit packages used to pay for new village halls, home improvements, reduced household energy bills and bursaries for children’s university fees in the affected communities.

Energy companies already provide community funds for areas in which they build their wind farms – but ministers want them to do more to help stifle local opposition and pave the way for thousands more turbines to be built in the countryside.

It is claimed that under the new proposals, developers would pay at least £5,000-a-year into a community trust for each megawatt of generating capacity they install.

For turbines with a generating capacity of 4mw, this would mean £20,000-a-year for each one. On a 20-turbine wind farm, the result would be £400,000 a year for the local community – or £10m over its 25-year lifespan.

The extra cost of the enhanced benefits scheme – which would also apply to fracking sites and even new nuclear power stations – would be passed on to customers through higher energy bills. Conservative county councillor Glen Sanderson has been leading efforts to clamp down on the number of wind farms being given the green light in Northumberland.

Yesterday he said: “We have had wind of this before. Some would describe it as incentives and others as bribery, although most people that I know would use the latter term.

“We have to be very careful not to be taken in by handfuls of silver, and allow damage to be caused to the countryside environment and tourism by wind farms for the sake of a few thousands of pounds.

“More money for community benefits might persuade one or two people, but I think the vast majority would not be taken in by this. It depends what price you put on rural views and the serenity of the countryside. You would need to pay an awful lot of money to make up for that sort of damage.”

John Grant is a member of Widdrington Parish Council, which recently objected to two separate wind farm schemes, involving a total of 13 turbines, near the village. The applications, by Infinis and Peel Energy, were both approved.

He said: “The community benefits we have been promised here are pretty derisory, and I’m sure the companies can afford to pay more, but I don’t think that would appease people affected by the turbines.

“My perception is that people are opposed to wind farms because of the impact they have on localities, and suspicion about how useful or efficient they are in producing energy. I don’t think it’s a question of money for the local communities.”

Wind farm developers pay between £1,000 and £2,000 per installed megawatt in community benefits in an attempt to win over locals. In a consultation exercise, the Government was so deluged by complaints about turbines that ministers decided the rate must go up to £5,000.

Source:  by David Black, The Journal | Dec 31 2012 | www.journallive.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky