LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm will put up temporary local office 

Opponents have argued that although the company has talked about the project’s economic impact on the county, the benefits will be spread throughout seven counties, including Logan, Union, Madison and Clark counties, among others. Opponents said it is common to have a trailer on site during a construction project, but the Logan County office is an indication of the company’s lack of commitment to Champaign County. Testimony on the case was completed recently. Jack Van Kley, an attorney representing the Union Neighbors United group that is opposed to the project, said attorneys have until Jan. 14 to file briefs, including a summary of the evidence, and how it should affect the Ohio Power Siting Board’s final ruling on the case.

Credit:  By Matt Sanctis | SPRINGFIELD NEWS-SUN | Saturday December 22, 2012 | www.dispatch.com ~~

SPRINGFIELD, Ohio – As the second phase of the Buckeye Wind Project moves forward in western Ohio’s Champaign County, project developers said they will have a temporary office available during construction to handle any questions or complaints from residents.

If the project is approved, it would install more than 50 wind turbines throughout the county at a cost of about $250 million, according to developers. It would create as many as 80 temporary construction jobs and have an economic impact of as much as $55 million on the region. Combined with an earlier first phase of the project, as many as 100 turbines could be installed throughout the county.

During recent testimony before the Ohio Power Siting Board, Champaign County prosecutors and opponents raised concerns that the project’s local office is located in Bellefontaine, which is in Logan County. A state staff member for the siting board also testified that he thought Bellefontaine was in Champaign County, although he also said he didn’t believe it is necessary for the developer to have an office in the same county as the project.

Developers have since said that they will have a temporary office on the construction site to alleviate any concerns or questions residents might have if the project is approved.

“During construction, we will have a local office where our maintenance folks will be housed and operate out of,” said Jason Dagger, project developer for the Buckeye Wind Project.

He said the office in Bellefontaine is for development purposes and will serve the company’s operations throughout Ohio. Everpower Renewables, the company in charge of the project, also has proposed a wind farm in Hardin County, although that project has not yet begun the siting process.

Opponents have argued that although the company has talked about the project’s economic impact on the county, the benefits will be spread throughout seven counties, including Logan, Union, Madison and Clark counties, among others. Opponents said it is common to have a trailer on site during a construction project, but the Logan County office is an indication of the company’s lack of commitment to Champaign County.

Testimony on the case was completed recently. Jack Van Kley, an attorney representing the Union Neighbors United group that is opposed to the project, said attorneys have until Jan. 14 to file briefs, including a summary of the evidence, and how it should affect the Ohio Power Siting Board’s final ruling on the case.

After attorneys have a chance to reply to those briefs, the adjudicatory law judges who heard the case will present their findings to the siting board.

Based on the experience from the first phase of the project, Dagger said, a decision could come as early as this spring.

“We’re expecting a decision around the March time frame for this project as well,” Dagger said.

Source:  By Matt Sanctis | SPRINGFIELD NEWS-SUN | Saturday December 22, 2012 | www.dispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky