[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Rock Island Clean Line serves only itself  

Credit:  Andrea Rackmyer | 12/21/2012 | www.mywebtimes.com ~~

I have no objection to companies who want to invest in Illinois’ electrical grid improvement or wind/solar energy projects that benefit Illinois residents.

Clean Line Energy Partners’ projects (headquartered in Texas, not Illinois), however, serve only the benefit of the company and its global and investment partners, and will bypass/undermine our state’s efforts to produce clean energy.

Key members of their executive staff held positions that established the standards that regulate this industry. Other key executives previously owned or worked for Horizon Wind Energy (Texas), sold out to EDP Renewables (a global energy giant) through Goldman Sachs in 2007, allowing them to collect more than $440 million from green energy stimulus over the past three years.

Do we really want a public utility that may sell out once its routes are established, and send our tax money straight out of the country, giving power over our utilities to a foreign nation?

Rock Island Clean Line doesn’t want to use existing roadway easements because it would cost more, and it would rather go through prime farmland, causing additional hardship to farmers heavily impacted by this year’s drought.

Over the past 30 years we have lost 45 million rural acres to development, with more than 23 million acres being prime farmland. This is a nonrenewable resource, and the damage by these projects cannot be undone. We cannot afford to allow our prime farmland to be destroyed/taken by eminent domain by companies who serve only themselves and global power brokers.

There are not thousands of new jobs as touted in the press, only a few hundred jobs from existing business connections as shown in their testimony submitted to the ICC. Most of the work is already contracted through companies outside the state of Illinois.

Rock Island Clean Line, one of Clean Line’s four projects nationwide, has withdrawn its request to the Illinois Commerce Commission under Docket 10-0579 to obtain public utility status to remove the objections/intervenes previously filed. The objectors have requested that previous objections be attached to RICL’s current filing submitted Oct.10, 2012, under Docket 12-0560.

I do not object to clean energy projects that benefit Illinois constituents. I object to Clean Line/RICL’s misleading practices that benefit only their executives with possible connections outside the U.S.

These executives helped establish standards regulating this industry while serving in government positions and/or sponsoring studies that justify their findings, and now work in the private sector to make monumental profits.

Since 2009, Clean Line has paid at least $190,000 to Washington lobbying firms. This green energy gold rush has allowed companies to cash in on billions of dollars designated for clean energy being pushed by Congress.

Rock Island Clean Line was forced by the ICC to have an established route submission, and only then did it contact the landowners affected. The firm spent its time marketing this project to power brokers/investment bankers rather than inform landowners of its true intentions.

I respectfully ask the public to contact the ICC at 217-782-7434, or online at www.icc.illinois.gov requesting they deny Rock Island Clean Line under Docket 12-0560 public utility status and the ability to use eminent domain to take private landowners’ property for their own personal gain.

Rock Island Clean Line’s project does not benefit the constituents of Illinois.

Andrea Rackmyer lives in rural Sheridan |

Source:  Andrea Rackmyer | 12/21/2012 | www.mywebtimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.