[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cape officials request ‘assurance’ commissioner will not influence wind project 

Credit:  By JAEGUN LEE, TIMES STAFF WRITER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2012, watertowndailytimes.com ~~

CAPE VINCENT – Town officials want “assurance” from the state Public Service Commission that Maureen F. Harris, a PSC commissioner who is married to an attorney representing BP Wind Energy, will not influence the Article X siting deliberations for the wind project.

Mrs. Harris is married to John S. Harris, an attorney working for BP. The wind developer and PSC said last week Mrs. Harris does not have a say in the outcome of state siting reviews.

But town officials are not convinced.

“Please understand that we in Cape Vincent have had a long, tortuous history of local municipal officials who have had direct conflicts of interest with BP and the other wind developer Acciona Energia,” they wrote in a letter to PSC Secretary Jaclyn A. Brilling. “As a community we are very, very sensitive to the conflict issue.”

Local officials asked in their letter that the PSC offer “some assurance that Commissioner Harris is not involved in the Article X process and that she would not have any influence over PSC staff who may be involved in any future proceedings” in the proposed Cape Vincent Wind Farm project’s siting review.

Earlier this year, BP acquired Spanish renewable energy company Acciona’s St. Lawrence Wind Farm, merging it with its Cape Vincent Wind Farm proposal.

The combined project calls for 124 turbines to be placed in the town to generate up to 285 megawatts of electricity, which is enough, the company estimates, to power a city the size of Syracuse.

Following the merger, the wind developer announced it would seek a state Article X process to expedite approval of the $300 million project and possibly bypass Cape Vincent’s strict zoning restrictions on wind turbines.

Article X of the state Public Service Law imposes a 12-month deadline for the review of the construction and operation of electric-generating facilities of 25 megawatts or higher and allows a state siting board to overrule what it deems to be unreasonable local laws.

Most recently, the wind farm developer sent the PSC its revised Public Involvement Program plan for community outreach and hopes to submit its preliminary scoping statement – BP’s next step in the preapplication process – as soon as Feb. 17.

The scoping statement requires developers to provide to the state agency a description of its facility and proposed impact studies, among other items.

Cape Vincent officials said they are worried Mrs. Harris would influence the appointment of a hearing examiner, who would oversee the preapplication process to mediate issues relating to the preliminary scoping statement.

They further argue Cape Vincent is at a disadvantage when it comes to access to state officials with the PSC, Department of Environmental Conservation, Department of Health and Energy Research and Development Authority.

“Regrettably, small municipalities do not have the same access and exposure to the state’s regulating bodies. We know as we proceed with BP’s Article X proposal that this imbalance puts Cape Vincent at a disadvantage,” they wrote. “Having BP’s attorney of record married to a PSC commissioner does nothing to mollify our fear of having the process tilted even further in favor of the applicant.”

Source:  By JAEGUN LEE, TIMES STAFF WRITER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2012, watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky