LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Regulatory plan for wind power is bad for towns 

Credit:  Republican-American | December 13, 2012 | www.rep-am.com ~~

The State Siting Council proposes to take from us our very right to freely own property in our towns, enjoying our solitude unencumbered by the onslaught of noisy industrial wind turbines soaring nearly 500 feet into the sky. If the council has its way, neither a municipal planning and zoning commission, nor any other local official or elected body, will be able to do a thing about it. Having been through this process in Prospect, I know how bad this can be for homeowners.

On Dec. 18, the legislature’s Regulations Review Committee will review the State Siting Council’s recommended wind-energy regulations. While the regulations proposed are lacking in too many areas to mention, there are two glaring pokes in the eye of Connecticut’s cities and towns. With the public’s help, the committee can reject these regulations as proposed.

First, the proposed setback of the giant turbines is a shocking 1.5 times the height, or 600 to 750 feet from a home. Second, the proposed regulations would not allow local governments to exercise any authority in these decisions.

It’s time to call your legislators, mayors and the Connecticut Council of Small Towns to tell them to you are not going to accept this theft of local control from our towns.

Timothy C. Reilly, Prospect

The writer was president of Save Prospect Corp., which opposed a windmill proposal by BNE Energy.

Source:  Republican-American | December 13, 2012 | www.rep-am.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky