LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Protesters rejoice after plan for six turbines is rejected 

Credit:  By Philippa Jenkins | North Devon Journal | December 13, 2012 | www.thisisnorthdevon.co.uk ~~

Fears of six turbines nearly the size of Big Ben being erected near Holsworthy have been quashed after Torridge District Council (TDC) rejected plans for the wind farm on Thursday.

The proposal for the 86-metre turbines at Wheelers Cross near Sutcombe, had outraged many people living in the villages nearby as they feel they have been swamped by the large number of turbines being erected around them.

The developers behind the scheme, Wind Prospect Developments Ltd, confirmed if the wind farm was approved it would produce enough electricity for 4,555 homes a year.

But at TDC’s plans committee meeting on Thursday, councillors considered the officer’s report which recommended the application should be refused on five grounds.

The grounds included the impact the development would create on the surrounding area, including the conservation zone of Bradworthy, the amount of noise they would produce, and the failure of the developers to supply sufficient bird and noise surveys.

At the meeting four people spoke objecting to the plans including Keith Tomlin, from Bradworthy Parish Council.

Mr Tomlin said: “There are 85 existing and proposed wind farms within 10km of Bradworthy.

“There is a lack of photomontages provided to show the effect the turbines will have which has been highlighted by Natural England. The area is home to migrating birds such as starlings and the blade flicker will effect them and cause disruption to the television signal.

He also mentioned that ancient woodland would be damaged.

Another objector, Pauline Green, said: “I am objecting with three key arguments. This is all about size and scale.

“These turbines would almost be the height of Big Ben, except Big Ben is in the centre of London. Your decision has to be about what is reasonable.

“We have our fair share of turbines in the area already, the area is becoming saturated.

“If you don’t stop approving these applications who will want to live and visit this area?”

Councillor Chris Leather proposed the application should be refused.

The chairman of the committee Councillor Rosemary Lock highlighted the comment from English Heritage which pointed out how loosely set out the turbines would be and their scale.

The application was refused by all councillors except one who abstained.

After the meeting Anna Grabis, who has been campaigning against the wind farm for seven years, said it was overwhelming to see the application being turned down.

She said: “We are absolutely delighted and feel slightly overwhelmed.

“We are so pleased the councillors made the right decision.

“It may be appealed but I am hopeful the inspector would not approve the application. We will just have to wait and see.”

Alastair Smith, the senior development manager at Wind Prospect Renewables, said: “We are not surprised but disappointed.

“There was not much discussion by the councillors so of course we are concerned they didn’t consider it enough.

“I can’t say if we will appeal at this stage. We need to wait for the decision notice to come through.

“Of course we don’t enter into projects without thinking an appeal is possible, though. We will have six months to make a decision and we won’t be waiting until the last minute.”

Source:  By Philippa Jenkins | North Devon Journal | December 13, 2012 | www.thisisnorthdevon.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky