News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Protective costs award to wind farm campaigners a first, says expert  

Credit:  13 Dec 2012 | www.out-law.com ~~

A judge has agreed to limit a Shetland Islands environmental group’s liability for legal costs to £5,000 in its judicial review of the Scottish Government’s decision to grant planning permission to a 103-turbine wind farm.

Sustainable Shetland is challenging the Viking Windfarm on a number of grounds, including the impact of the project on protected species and the landscape and the failure by ministers to hold a public local inquiry.

The protective costs order (PCO) will see the campaigners’ potential exposure to legal costs limited to £5,000 with a cap of £30,000 put on the ministers’ expenses, according to the Shetland Times. In addition, the campaign group will have no liability for developers’ expenses. Sir Crispin Agnew of Lochnaw QC, representing Sustainable Shetland, had argued that the group had no “economic interest” in the outcome of the challenge.

Energy law expert Russell Spinks of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, said that the case marked the first time that protected expenses had been successfully sought for a challenge to a renewables development. He added that the £5,000 cap granted to the campaigners would likely prove “worrying” for developers.

“Since the concept of a Protective Expenses Order was ruled competent in Scotland in 2010, we have seen the concept become gradually more prevalent,” he said. “This case is the first time they have been successfully sought for a challenge to a renewables development, however it is unlikely to be the last. The low level of the cap for potential adverse losses, worryingly for developers of traditional and renewable energy sources alike, is only likely to encourage third party challenges to an EIA development in future.”

A PCO can be granted where a court is of the view that the issues being raised in a case are of wider public interest. They are intended to ensure that judicial reviews against public bodies are not prevented from going ahead because an applicant might not be able to pay that body’s costs in the event that the application is dismissed. They are frequently issued in environmental law cases, where there can often be an overlap between local interests and principles of EU law.

The Ministry of Justice recently announced that it would extend the PCO regime in environmental law cases in England and Wales from the end of this year. Courts will be able to grant PCOs before deciding whether to proceed with an application, rather than waiting until permission to proceed with the challenge had been granted, provided that the claim falls clearly within the scope of the Aarhus Convention. A consultation on the potential introduction of a similar regime in Scotland closed in April; however, the Scottish Government has not yet issued a response.

Under the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), implemented in the EU by the Public Participation Directive, public bodies must ensure that the public have access to a procedure to challenge decisions relating to the environment to the extent permitted by national law. Amongst other things, the Convention specifies that this procedure should not be “prohibitively expensive”.

Source:  13 Dec 2012 | www.out-law.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.