[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cold, harsh wind of reality 

Credit:  The Standard | Dec. 10, 2012 | www.standard.net.au ~~

We read it in The Standard first! ‘Wind energy lacks peak puff’ (The Standard, December 6).

So if the “hundreds of wind turbines scattered across the south-west” ran at only eight per cent of capacity when demand hit its peak, why does the state’s energy minister persist with this folly?

And this, when electricity demand overall has fallen in the last three years.

Some simple research on the topic of comparative energy output reveals what many have long suspected: that wind energy is capable of producing electricity – but not enough of it and not reliably enough to meet the demands of large, sophisticated, industrialised societies like ours. Beneficiaries do not include local communities – the promises of jobs are empty, as manufacture and construction is outsourced; the promise of “renewable” is laughable given that the component parts, including the towers, have a life-span of 20 years.

However, wind farm companies avoid answering awkward questions, including the main concern: cost-effectiveness.

But then, they don’t need to. Canberra is desperate that the states will meet its renewable energy targets and offers lavish subsidies to wind farm companies willing to take on the challenge. And who pays for this? Why, you and me – the taxpayer and the consumer who pays for ever-increasing, unsustainable costs for domestic electricity use.

Oh, and the rural communities pay extra: they can look forward to seeing massive, rusting white-elephants right here in their own backyard!

The answer to these concerns is on The Standard’s front page: use the gas-fired power stations (already proven to be cleaner and greener than coal) to supplement existing power sources and divert those subsidy dollars to research solar as the only truly viable, alternative energy source in Australia.

Sharyn Anderson, Mill Street, Mortlake

Source:  The Standard | Dec. 10, 2012 | www.standard.net.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky