[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Cold, harsh wind of reality  

Credit:  The Standard | Dec. 10, 2012 | www.standard.net.au ~~

We read it in The Standard first! ‘Wind energy lacks peak puff’ (The Standard, December 6).

So if the “hundreds of wind turbines scattered across the south-west” ran at only eight per cent of capacity when demand hit its peak, why does the state’s energy minister persist with this folly?

And this, when electricity demand overall has fallen in the last three years.

Some simple research on the topic of comparative energy output reveals what many have long suspected: that wind energy is capable of producing electricity – but not enough of it and not reliably enough to meet the demands of large, sophisticated, industrialised societies like ours. Beneficiaries do not include local communities – the promises of jobs are empty, as manufacture and construction is outsourced; the promise of “renewable” is laughable given that the component parts, including the towers, have a life-span of 20 years.

However, wind farm companies avoid answering awkward questions, including the main concern: cost-effectiveness.

But then, they don’t need to. Canberra is desperate that the states will meet its renewable energy targets and offers lavish subsidies to wind farm companies willing to take on the challenge. And who pays for this? Why, you and me – the taxpayer and the consumer who pays for ever-increasing, unsustainable costs for domestic electricity use.

Oh, and the rural communities pay extra: they can look forward to seeing massive, rusting white-elephants right here in their own backyard!

The answer to these concerns is on The Standard’s front page: use the gas-fired power stations (already proven to be cleaner and greener than coal) to supplement existing power sources and divert those subsidy dollars to research solar as the only truly viable, alternative energy source in Australia.

Sharyn Anderson, Mill Street, Mortlake

Source:  The Standard | Dec. 10, 2012 | www.standard.net.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.