[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘How many are too many?’ — councillors fear cumulative effect of Angus wind turbines 

Credit:  By Richard Watt | The Courier | 6 December 2012 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Individual wind turbines could eventually “ring fence” Angus hillsides, councillors have claimed.

Councillors on the development standards committee approved a single turbine at Edzell on Tuesday, despite worries over its proximity to the Caterthuns.

Brown and White Caterthuns are the setting for hillforts classed as Scheduled Ancient Monuments, which Historic Scotland has said could be affected by wind development.

A council officer said on Tuesday that plans for an installation west of Auchenreoch Farm, Inchbare, was in the planning pipeline, alongside others at Balrennie Farm, Chapelton of Menmuir and Cairndrum Farm – with the latter being withdrawn.

Two of these were closer to the Caterthuns, he added.

There had been three representations made on cumulative, landscape, visual, and noise impact grounds, one being from Inveresk Community Council.

Brechin and Edzell SNP councillor Mairi Evans said she was worried about the amount of applications in the area.

”I have to echo some of the concerns of the community council and Historic Scotland around the cumulative impact of all these applications,” she said.

”We could see the Caterthuns being almost ring-fenced by turbines and the questions is how many are too many? Where do we draw the line?”

Independent Carnoustie councillor Bill Bowles said he also shared in this concern.

”I feel there must be a point of saturation where the area is going to start looking like a windfarm,” he said. ”The council might be best coming up with a single policy to deal with all these individual applications.”

Source:  By Richard Watt | The Courier | 6 December 2012 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky