[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Stinchcombe wind turbine decision may mark change in planning policy 

Credit:  By Lucy Fulford | Gazette | 4 December 2012 | www.gazetteseries.co.uk ~~

Planning policy may have been changed forever by an inspector’s decision to turn down an appeal for a wind farm in the Berkeley Vale.

Last week an independent planning inspector dismissed an appeal from green energy firm Ecotricity to build four 120-metre high wind turbines at Standle Farm, near Stinchcombe.

District councillors said this ruling showed that landscape issues were of greater significance than previously thought.

Philip Skill, head of planning at Stroud District Council, said this week: “The changes to planning policy with the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework, were initially thought to have favoured renewable energy schemes, but this judgement appears to put the landscape issues higher up the agenda, particularly where large developments like wind farms and incinerators are concerned.”

Stroud planners originally refused Ecotricity permission to build the wind farm last April because of its impact on the landscape of the Berkeley Vale.

Ecotricity appealed the decision.

In his report, independent inspector Richard Thomas, who conducted the inquiry, highlighted landscape issues as a key reason to dismiss the appeal.

He cited the impact the turbines would have on the settings of the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), Stinchcombe Conservation Area, the church of St Cyr’s and Berkeley Castle.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), which welcomed the inspector’s decision, said the turbines would have had a negative visual impact on the surrounding communities.

Cllr Geoff Wheeler, leader of Stroud District Council, said the council was pleased with the inspector’s decision.

He said: “It is gratifying to note that the inspector agrees with our councillors on how the effect of these turbines on the AONB can be felt several kilometres away from the escarpment.

“This judgement will have significant implications for the planning application for the proposed waste incinerator at Javelin Park in Haresfield and we would ask the county councillors to read this appeal report prior to making their own difficult decisions.”

Javelin Park is the proposed site for a controversial £500 million incinerator for household waste.

Source:  By Lucy Fulford | Gazette | 4 December 2012 | www.gazetteseries.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky