[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm complaint  

Credit:  By Donna Barker | Bureau County Republican | November 30, 2012 | www.bcrnews.com ~~

OHIO – Edison Mission Group, the owner of Big Sky wind farm north of Ohio, has responded to a complaint filed against it by Suzlon Energy Ltd., the company which had made the turbines used by the wind farm.

Suzlon Energy Ltd. filed its complaint against Big Sky earlier this year claiming Big Sky improperly refused to make a prepayment for turbines supplied to Big Sky. The Ohio-based wind farm bought 114 Suzlon turbines in October 2009 for the Big Sky project.

According to the 25-page Big Sky response filed Nov. 2 in New York’s Supreme Court, the relationship between Suzlon and Edison Mission Energy dates back to approximately 2005.

Concerning the Suzlon charges, Big Sky’s response states Big Sky is required to prepay the loan to Suzlon only if four conditions are all satisfied on the same date. As of Aug. 9, Big Sky denied the four mandatory prepayment conditions had been satisfied because numerous un-remarked serial defects affected the wind turbines supplied by Suzlon.

Big Sky admitted it received a letter from Suzlon dated Aug. 9, but denied any allegation the prepayment conditions had been satisfied as of that date because numerous un-remedied serial defects in design affected wind turbine generators supplied to Big Sky by Suzlon. Big Sky did concede the first three prepayment conditions had been satisfied.

Suzlon is alleging there are no un-remedied serial defects at the Big Sky project, as of Aug. 8.

The counterclaim by Big Sky seeks a declaratory judgment that patent and/or latent design defects in the wind turbines sold by Suzlon to Big Sky constitute “serial defects” under the language of the parties’ turbine supply agreement and that the existence of any un-remedied serial defects in those wind turbines precludes Suzlon from collecting prepayment on a vendor finance loan it made to Big Sky.

Comment on this story at www.bcrnews.com.

Source:  By Donna Barker | Bureau County Republican | November 30, 2012 | www.bcrnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter