[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ross turbine go-ahead despite councillor’s ‘scarring’ fears  

Credit:  By Hugh Ross | Ross-shire Journal | 27 November 20121 | www.ross-shirejournal.co.uk ~~

A Ross-shire farm has been granted permission to erect a new turbine – despite a veteran Dingwall councillor claiming the amount of wind-hungry structures are scarring the local hillside.

James Brown and Partners, of Somerby Farm, Lochussie, got the green light from Highland Council on Tuesday to erect the 45.6-metre high turbine on one of its fields.

A decision had been postponed by the north planning applications committee back in September because councillors criticised the photographs of the projected turbines and said they were not good enough.

The farm had originally intended to build three turbines but cut that to one instead and improved photographs were provided to the committee which approved the scheme.

However, committee member Margaret Paterson said she had grave misgivings about the revised development and had changed her mind about the impact of solitary turbines.

“Life can be difficult sometimes,” said Councillor Paterson, at the meeting in Inverness.

“If we refuse it, they [applicant] will go to appeal. I am sure it will impact on the area, I have always said that one turbine I didn’t have a problem with but now we are getting more and more.

“When is it going to stop? I know I have approved some of them but that hillside is so beautiful, that face is becoming so cluttered. I know it has been cut from three to one but I just want to know, when is enough, enough?”

Ferintosh Community Council had been among the six objectors.

Planning officer Julie Ferguson told the committee that the turbine was not considered to have a major impact on the landscape or dominate its surroundings.

She said other manmade structures like electricity pylons and a wind turbine at the Dingwall auction mart, which was controversially approved earlier this year, were also in the vicinity while the new turbine was not close to the road.

Source:  By Hugh Ross | Ross-shire Journal | 27 November 20121 | www.ross-shirejournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.