LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Support research, not wind energy credit 

Credit:  The Bulletin | November 16, 2012 | www.bendbulletin.com ~~

Tax increases alone are not enough to balance the U.S. budget; it will take spending cuts as well to get the job done. One place to start is with the generous federal tax credit currently given to those in the wind energy business.

The credit, which costs $12 billion, is due to expire at the end of the year, and governors from several states, including Oregon’s John Kitzhaber, earlier this week called on Congress and the administration to keep them alive. Failure to do so could cost as many as 37,000 jobs, one study said.

Supporters of the credit are correct in noting that this country has subsidized everything from the spread of electricity into rural America to highways to oil production. Wind, they argue, is among the energy alternatives that will help save the planet from global warming.

But just because subsidies were routine in the past doesn’t mean they should continue to be routine today. Unless the United States wants to become the western hemisphere’s version of Greece, it must get its financial house in order, and that means cutting its obscenely large deficit, a process that almost by definition will be a painful one.

Nor should cutting subsidies mean the government has given up on the fight against global warming. Rather, cutting subsidies to those who produce wind energy and the equipment they use could free up money for something even more important, and that’s research into the best way to get the job done. Alternative energy sources are, no doubt, a big part of this country’s future, and government-financed research is critical to ensuring we get what we need in a way we can use.

The federal government long has been a financier of research in all sorts of areas, from medicine to space to, believe it or not, work done under the wing of the Internal Revenue Service. Putting more money into research on everything from wave energy to the current geothermal experiments being conducted at Newberry Crater, to, yes, wind power makes far more sense than continuing tax breaks for an industry around which questions of efficiency and efficacy continue to swirl.

Source:  The Bulletin | November 16, 2012 | www.bendbulletin.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon