[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Rooksbridge wind farm protesters fear appeal 

Credit:  By Kirsty James | This is The West Country | 17 November 2012 | www.thisisthewestcountry.co.uk ~~

Campaigners against proposals for a wind farm at Rooksbridge fear if the application went to appeal they could be met with an ongoing battle.

Consultation for the application by Broadview Energy to build four 130m turbines on land at Pilrow Farm came to a close last weekend and it is now under consideration by Sedgemoor District Council.

But campaign group NoPilrow have voiced concerns after the same developer announced it was investigating a revised scheme for another wind farm at a site near Kimbolton, following a decision by Huntingdonshire District Council to reject a proposal at the same site.

NoPilrow spokesman David Maund said: “In March campaigners thought they had won after an appeal to build four 125-metre wind turbines near Kimbolton was rejected.

“However, I’ve read that Broadview is now considering a revised application for the same area.

“One can reasonably assume that, should Pilrow wind farm be refused consent, Broadview will consider treading the same path and launch a planning appeal, followed by a fresh planning application should the appeal fail.”

But, speaking about Kimbolton, Broadview’s project manager, Tom Cosgrove, said: “No decision has yet been made to prepare and submit a planning application.

“Any decision to that effect will be subject to the findings of further detailed studies, including proper consideration of local and national planning policy and the Government inspector’s comments.”

He added: “In this case, the planning officer highlighted specific things which could be improved. “The majority of the time it’s not likely to go to appeal.”

Source:  By Kirsty James | This is The West Country | 17 November 2012 | www.thisisthewestcountry.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky