[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

6 investigates follow-up: wind turbines worth the cost?  

Credit:  By Andrew Ellison | KRIS-TV | www.msnbc.msn.com ~~

CORPUS CHRISTI – We have a 6 News investigation follow up on four wind turbines the city installed on the bayfront that don’t really power anything. As we’ve reported, the turbines, which cost nearly half a million dollars to build, were part of a bayfront improvement plan in the 2004 Bond Election.

Today, we learned the city council members at the time knew the turbines wouldn’t produce much power. So we wanted to know why the city spent so much money on them.

We tried to ask City Manager Ron Olson about the turbines, but he told us he couldn’t comment because he wasn’t city manager at the time.

So we asked Mayor Joe Adame if the turbines were really worth the cost.

“I think they do supply an image to the community that we are eco-friendly,” Adame says.

But if the turbines are there just for their image, are they really worth nearly half a million dollars?

Mayor-Elect Nelda Martinez was part of the effort to build these turbines. She told us they haven’t lived up to the energy expectations the council had for them. So we asked her if they were really worth it.

She said they were part of the package that voters voted for back in the 2004 Bond Election.

But even though voters did vote for that project, it included some options that would be at the city council’s discretion. The wind turbines were one of those options.

So we talked with one of the original engineers from the project, Kevin Stowers.

He told us the turbines are hooked up to the electrical grid, but barely produce enough energy to power a small house.

What’s more, he told us the council knew that the energy output would be minimal.

“Staff’s original recommendation was not to award the turbines. That was an additive alternate,” Stowers says.

He says the goal of the turbines was really more about the look than really producing a meaningful amount of energy.

So the question is are then nearly half a million dollars spent to build these turbines worth it if the energy being outputed can barely power a small house?

Source:  By Andrew Ellison | KRIS-TV | www.msnbc.msn.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.