[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Counties with wind farms overwhelmingly opposed renewable energy plan 

Credit:  By ZACHARY PEÑA | Capital News Service | via news.jrn.msu.edu November 9, 2012 ~~

LANSING – Environmental groups are preparing their next move after voters overwhelmingly rejected a constitutional amendment to require 25 percent of the state’s electricity to come from renewable sources.

Statewide, more than 62 percent opposed the renewable energy plan, based on unofficial returns collected by the Secretary of State.

The only county where it passed was Washtenaw, where nearly 52 percent voted yes.

Three of the four counties with the greatest percentage of voters rejecting the proposals have wind farms: Missaukee (79 percent), Huron (77.5 percent) and Osceola (74 percent).

John Sarver, executive director of the Great Lakes Renewable Energy Association, gave two theories for the Election Day failure.

One is that voters felt amending the constitution was unnecessary.

“Another is that a minority of residents may not like the way wind farms look and they constitute the extra ‘no’ votes,” Sarver said.
Opponents said factors leading voters to reject the proposal included high costs, contentment with existing energy policy and the loss of acreage to wind turbines.

Jeff Holyfield, director of news and information for Consumers Energy., said, “Voters understood the 2008 energy laws are working well.

“At the end of the day, really what the customers want is an adequate supply of affordable electricity, and they weren’t willing to gamble with Proposal 3,” Holyfield said.

In nine counties with wind farms or active plans for them, the proposal was rejected by a greater percentage than it was statewide, with 73 percent voting no. They are Missaukee, Huron, Osceola, Delta, Mason, Sanilac, Emmet, Gratiot and Tuscola.

Proposal 3 supporters said they are eagerly awaiting Gov. Rick Snyder’s special energy policy address expected near the end of November.

The Michigan Environmental Council, a coalition of state environmental organizations, will urge Snyder to consider additional renewable energy standards and hopes for a strong statement advocating clean energy, said the group’s communications director, Hugh McDiarmid.

“Come January when we start with a new legislature, we’re looking for something to encourage the public to vote on future clean energy proposals,” McDiarmid said.

“The prices from renewable energy sources are dropping while conventional source prices are rising. We think it makes sense from a job standpoint and an environmental standpoint as well” to pursue wind energy, he said.

And Sarver said the Great Lakes Renewable Energy Association will work on many projects to lower energy-related costs for homeowners.

“There are so many benefits from renewable energy that to me, it’s inevitable that we’re going to use more wind and solar power,” he said. “It’s just a question of how quickly and at what pace.”

Consumer Energy’s own Lake Winds Energy Park – a 100-megawatt, 56-turbine Mason County wind farm – is expected to start serving customers before the end of November, said Holyfield.

As final testing is underway for the energy park in Riverton and Summit townships, zoning processes are underway for a 150-megawatt wind farm in Tuscola County, he said.

The utility expects to launch that project in 2015.

Zachary Peña writes for Great Lakes Echo.

Source:  By ZACHARY PEÑA | Capital News Service | via news.jrn.msu.edu November 9, 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky