[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Critic won’t be silenced over wind farm data  

Credit:  By Peter Collins | The Standard | Nov. 8, 2012 | www.standard.net.au ~~

Darlington farmer Hamish Cumming is continuing his campaign for more transparency in figures quoted by energy companies for government subsidies.

Mr Cumming, who was mentioned in the Senate last month as being the victim of alleged death threats, arson attacks and discrediting of his engineering credentials, told The Standard yesterday he was not deterred.

“If I’m wrong, say I’m wrong and prove it,” he said.

“I believe energy companies are trying to mask what they are doing with figures for wind farms and coal-burning power stations.

“Recent reports from Ireland and The Netherlands show wind farms claim two to three times what they are abating.

“I believe companies are using reverse calculations of their figures.”

His claims were again dismissed by the Clean Energy Council of Australia (CECA), which represents most wind farm companies operating in the south-west.

“He is demonstrably wrong,” CECA media manager Mark Bretherton said.

Mr Cumming has been a long-time opponent of the Mortlake wind farm project and claimed sensitive brolga population data had been deliberately omitted from the Atlas of Victorian Wildlife.

He maintains wind farms are an ineffective way of reducing greenhouse emissions.

Senator Chris Back told the Senate on October 30 that Mr Cumming had been heavily criticised after being quoted in The Australian newspaper on September 1.

CECA policy director Russell Marsh replied to the newspaper by describing Mr Cumming as “an activist who is not a mechanical engineer” and his claims as “amateur analysis riddled with errors and incorrect assumptions”.

Mr Cumming said he was still awaiting an apology he had sought from Mr Marsh.

He is also still seeking answers from the Clean Energy Regulator to his question: are wind developments actually reducing greenhouse gas emissions?

“I defend my credentials. I’ve worked all around the world as an engineer,” Mr Cumming said.

Source:  By Peter Collins | The Standard | Nov. 8, 2012 | www.standard.net.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.