LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

VA turbine casting a static shadow 

Credit:  Written by Kirsti Marohn | Nov. 4, 2012 | www.sctimes.com ~~

A wind turbine on the St. Cloud VA Health Care System campus hasn’t produced electricity since August.

VA officials have been negotiating with the Massachusetts-based contractor that installed the turbine to fix problems that have plagued it since it began operating in April 2011.

The turbine, the first in the nation built on a VA campus, was touted as a model for renewable energy projects. It was expected to produce about 15 percent of the VA’s electricity, saving a projected $98,000 each year.

Instead, the turbine has been available for energy production only 47 percent of the time since it was installed, said Barry Venable, public affairs officer for the St. Cloud VA. He said it has been inoperable since Aug. 15.

“The hospital’s view is the turbine project continues to exhibit an unacceptable level of performance,” Venable said. “Our desire is an operational turbine.”

It was expected that the turbine would remain in the commissioning phase for a few weeks. Instead, the VA has not yet accepted the project, Venable said.

The $2.3 million project was funded through a federal stimulus grant. It helps the VA comply with a 2005 law that requires federal agencies to generate at least 7.5 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2013.

The turbine was installed by JK Scanlan Co. of East Falmouth, Mass. Messages left at JK Scanlan’s headquarters were not returned.

One option the VA could take is to file a termination for default, an action the federal government can take against a contractor for failing to meet the terms of the contract.

In an email sent in response to a request for an interview, Mark Ballesteros, a spokesman for the federal VA headquarters,

said the agency remains in communication with the contractor and has not terminated the contract.

“The VA and the contractor have a mutual interest in quickly resolving the issues surrounding the inoperability,” Ballesteros stated.

Venable said the problems are solely with this turbine and not with the idea of harnessing wind to power the VA campus.

“We think the concept is still valid,” he said. “The issue here is we need a machine that works properly.”

Source:  Written by Kirsti Marohn | Nov. 4, 2012 | www.sctimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky