[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

End of story? Speculation grows that Gilead Power is retreating from Ostrander Point 

Credit:  Rick Conroy | The Times | November 2nd, 2012 | wellingtontimes.ca ~~

Is it over for the wind energy factory at Ostrander Point? Has this nine turbine project on Crown land on the south shore of the County become the first casualty of the departure of Dalton McGuinty?

Several sources speculated this week that Gilead Power Corporation had appealed to Hydro One seeking a return of its $5 million deposit. The company paid this money last fall in anticipation of approval by spring or summer. The project’s outlook then looked much brighter than it does today.

At the time the pathway for the developer seemed clear—all that was left to do was clear the 60-day review period in which the public could voice their objections or support for the project. MPP Todd Smith pushed for and received an extension to the deadline to account for the Christmas break.

Despite the fact that the project’s proponents acknowledged it would likely have an impact on two endangered species, the Blandings turtle and whippoorwill, the public review was widely seen as a formality. When the review period closed the comments and opinions were brought into the Ministry of Environment for a final decision.

Many expected the Ministry would simply acknowledge the opposition that had arrayed against the project—which included conservancy groups such as Nature Canada, the Audubon Society and Ontario Nature—but would nevertheless give the developer the green light.

Gilead Power likely had the same view—as it put up a $5 million deposit to Hydro One for work to extend transmission lines from a substation in Milford to Ostrander Point.

But as the weeks and months went by, doubt about the project began to sprout. By June it was clear the project had stalled—but the nature of the delay was unclear. On the Ministry of Environment’s website, the project remains listed as under technical review.

Residents of South Marysburgh and elsewhere waited for news about the project that could come any day.

Then, earlier this month Premier Dalton McGuinty announced he was stepping down and proroguing the Ontario legislature. Would he press his green energy agenda even as a lame duck? Would he see this fight in Prince Edward County as an important symbol of his conviction in the righteousness of wind energy? Even if the habitat of a couple of species hung in the balance? Would he defy the environmental and conservancy groups urging him to keep these turbines away from one of Ontario’s designated Important Bird Areas?

Of course, even if the reports that Gilead Power has asked for its deposit back from Hydro One prove true, it doesn’t necessarily follow that the project is dead. Gilead may simply want its money back in its bank acount until the future of this project is clearer. Among other options, Gilead could sell the project to another developer—one with the patience and financial legs to force the provincial government’s hand.

In any event it has proved much harder to overcome the opposition to wind factories in North Marysburgh than some developers had imagined. For opponents to this development it is still too soon to celebrate.

Update: A hired spokesperson has said that Gilead Power remains committed to developing the Ostrander Point project. Kevin Lennon denied too that Gilead Power had asked for its deposit from Hydro One to be returned.

Source:  Rick Conroy | The Times | November 2nd, 2012 | wellingtontimes.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky