LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New study links wind turbines to ill health 

Credit:  By Jonathan Sher, The London Free Press | November 2, 2012 | www.lfpress.com ~~

LONDON, ONT. – They live in the shadow of wind farms, and their stories of turbine-induced illness have been brushed aside by the wind industry, Ontario regulators and the province’s Liberal government.

But now, researchers have published the first ever peer-reviewed study linking wind turbines and ill health – giving opponents of wind turbines their heaviest arsenal in a fight that could shape the landscape of rural Ontario and perhaps political fortunes in the next election.

“I view it as a huge step forward. It definitely gives credibility to our case,” said Esther Wrightman, who’s led a crusade against 70 wind turbines west of Strathroy.

The study, published in the periodical Noise and Health, found that a random sample of residents living within 1.4 km of wind turbines in two Maine communities suffered more from impaired mental health and sleep deprivation than those who lived at least 3.3 km away.

That was their finding, even though most of the closer residents had welcomed the turbines because they came with a financial benefit.

The epidemiologist who created the study is a Guelph, Ont., resident who worked eight years for Health Canada.

Jeffery Aramini says he’s not eager to cross swords with public health officials – Aramini’s company does business with the provincial and federal governments, helping them, for example, to monitor certain diseases based on pharmacy records.

But while public health officials in Ontario generally do well by the provinces’s residents, when it comes to wind turbines, those officials have had a major blind spot, he said.

While the peer-review study this month is the first, there’s a growing number of people reporting illness near wind farms, Aramini said.

“The reality is that some people are getting sick,” he said. “As a public health person, I can’t wrap my head around (government’s inaction).”

Regulators and Liberal politicians have pushed for wind power by pointing to a report by Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Arlene King, who two years ago dismissed health concerns in part because there were no peer-reviewed studies showing a link between turbines and illness.

“Published papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals (carry) more weight in the assessment of health risks than case studies and anecdotal reports,” she wrote.

Asked Thursday if the study would cause her to re-assess, King declined to be interviewed, directing questions to the environment ministry.

When QMI Agency asked why King would pass off a question to someone without expertise in public health, she had a health ministry spokesperson reply instead.

“This (new study) has not changed the conclusions of (King’s) report,” the spokesperson e-mailed.

King’s reply drew an angry reaction from Wrightman: “She’s passing the buck…. That is just ridiculous.”

Much quicker to respond was the lobby group for the wind industry, the Canadian Wind Energy Association.

“The balance of scientific, medical and human experience to date clearly demonstrates that sound from wind turbines does not adversely impact human health,” spokesperson Chris Forrest said.

The comment was dismissed as self-interest by the head of a consortium of community groups opposed to industrial wind farms.

“We’ve been waiting for this study for a long time – it’s just amazing,” said Jane Wilson of Wind Concerns Ontario.

Click here to read the study.

Source:  By Jonathan Sher, The London Free Press | November 2, 2012 | www.lfpress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky