| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
McGuinty favoured urbanites, critics say; Gas plants nixed, but not wind turbines
Credit: The Canadian Press | November 1, 2012 | www.ottawacitizen.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Ontario’s Liberal government bowed to public pressure and cancelled gas plants in Oakville and Mississauga but at the same time ignored smaller and rural communities that had no power to block large wind turbines, opposition MPPs charged Wednesday.
Voters in the heavily populated area around Toronto clearly matter more to the Liberals than people in rural Ontario, who had no say about the location of large energy projects in their communities, said Progressive Conservative Jim Wilson.
“I represent a small community and our votes don’t hardly count, according to Mr. McGuinty. We don’t have equal rights I guess,” Wilson said in an interview.
Premier Dalton McGuinty said comparing the cancelled generating stations with giant wind turbines is comparing apples and oranges because the gas plants emit pollution while the wind turbines do not.
The premier said his government decided to scrap the large gas-fired Oakville generating station, which it announced in 2008, because of tougher rules the Liberals introduced the next year.
“Under the Green Energy Act standards, where we were putting in a 900-megawatt gas plant, we couldn’t even locate a single, two-megawatt wind turbine,” said McGuinty.
“So our standards kind of overtook us, and we thought it was appropriate to relocate that gas plant.”
However, McGuinty did not offer a similar defence for the Mississauga gas plant, which the Liberal campaign team halted in mid-construction two weeks before voting day in last fall’s general election.
The NDP and Tories say taxpayers are stuck with a $1-billion bill for the Liberals’ decisions to cancel the two gas plants to save Liberal seats, but the government puts the total cost at $230 million.
“I think he played a very cynical game with the gas plants,” said New Democrat Peter Tabuns.
“He put that plant there knowing that demand was dropping in Ontario. He thought he could get away with it, (but) he couldn’t, and we’re stuck with the bill.”
McGuinty noted Wednesday that the Liberals also changed the rules to give smaller communities more of a say in the location of industrial wind turbines, but not a veto.
“If you want to locate some wind turbines and you don’t have the support of the local community, then you’re going to the back of the line,” McGuinty told reporters.
The Tories said McGuinty’s “back of the line” defence hasn’t stopped any large wind farms in Ontario.
“Any project that I’m aware of is still steamrollering ahead, despite the new window dressing that Mc-Guinty has put on it,” said Wilson.
The Liberals have faced a lot of anger from local councils in parts of Ontario for not allowing them to block energy projects in their communities, and some opponents of wind farms claim low-level noise from the giant turbines is making them sick.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=29631 ]
