LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Another explanation? 

Credit:  Falmouth Enterprise | Oct 30, 2012 | ~~

After reading Friday’s Enterprise, “Selectmen Will Oppose Wind Turbine Bylaw,” I wonder how more convoluted this wind turbine debacle will get.

Selectmen oppose the planning board’s revised bylaw because it bans the relocation option. However, if the selectmen’s Wind Turbine Options Process (WTOP) liaisons (Mary Pat Flynn and Doug Jones) would have informed the rest of the board that the WTOP group dismissed the relocation option, this board miscommunication would have been averted.

To be clear: the WTOP group agreed the relocation option was not viable due to the likelihood of FAA restrictions so close to the Cape Cod Coast Guard Air Station. But more importantly, they don’t want to inflict the same potential harm, as it exists in Falmouth neighborhoods, upon military families at base residences.

Not long ago Selectman Murphy said that he was old enough, mature enough and wise enough to know that when you make a mistake, you have to ’fess up and admit it. He noted that the reality is that we have turbines worth $14 million in the ground there, but the reality is also is that we’ve aggrieved some neighbors. He said those are our friends, neighbors, voters and taxpayers too. Are not those military families equally important now, as much as ever?

The board’s insistence for a by-law provision allowing relocation is both contradictory with the WTOP group’s examination of the relocation option, as well as being inconsistent in the care that should be afforded our military friends, neighbors, voters and taxpayers.

Or, is there another explanation selectmen would like to share, to clear up the confusion?

Mark J. Cool
Fire Tower Road
West Falmouth

Source:  Falmouth Enterprise | Oct 30, 2012 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky