[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plea over windfarm saturation 

Credit:  By Andrew Clarke | The Whitehaven News | www.whitehavennews.co.uk ~~

The leader of Cumbria County Council has written to Parliament to express concern about the number of windfarms the county is being “subjected to”.

Eddie Martin has written to environment secretary Owen Paterson saying that our “most treasured landscapes will soon be surrounded by a ring of steel”.

Coun Martin is speaking at a time when Copeland Council is embroiled in a planning row with renewable energy firm Banks Renewables over its plans for the six-turbine Weddicar Rigg, on land between Moresby Parks and Frizington.

Copeland Council turned the plans down two weeks ago, but was told by Banks that it intends to take the matter to a public inquiry. However, Copeland has not yet received a formal appeal.

Coun Martin says in his letter: “Many Cumbrians are growing increasingly concerned in regard to the significant pressure the county is being subjected to in order to accommodate wind energy development. There is a strong feeling that Cumbria now has a very limited capacity to accommodate additional turbines.

“The cumulative impact of successive schemes is leading to concerns that our most treasured landscapes will soon be surrounded by a ‘ring of steel’.

“The local communities who have to live with the turbines often experience only negative impacts, and feel powerless to stop inappropriate developments, since the final decisions on many proposals are ultimately taken out of local hands, and made by a government appointed planning inspector. In the era of localism and the big society, this seems very unjust.

“It is also worth noting that defending a decision to refuse an inappropriate scheme at inquiry can be very costly for the local planning authority – a cost which must ultimately be borne by local people.”

Source:  By Andrew Clarke | The Whitehaven News | www.whitehavennews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky