[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Proposal 3 is not about energy, but about special interest groups  

Credit:  www.mlive.com ~~

Proposal 3 is a costly initiative that has no place in Michigan’s Constitution. The proposal would require 25 percent of Michigan’s electricity to come from renewable energy sources by 2025. Locking Proposal 3 into the constitution would force the state to meet the mandate, and severely reduce energy policy flexibility. Michigan would be the only state to create a constitutional amendment to do so.

Proposal 3 threatens local zoning and the right of local communities to decide if they want renewable energy technology in their areas. Residents would no longer have a say in wind farm placement. I know of no one that wants to endanger the environment, but that is not what this issue is about. Proposal 3 is about special interest groups trying to change the future of Michigan by changing the state constitution.

The residents of this state are being misled by commercials intended to make the viewer believe that a heavy reliance on renewable energy is a job creation venture, when the reality, at this present time, is renewable energy is far more expensive and much less efficient than the present sources. With an average increase of over 50 percent compared to conventional energy generation, Michigan voters are still being erroneously led to believe that their energy bills will be reduced. Unless heavily subsidized by the federal government, alternate energy cannot compete with current sources available at this time.

Michigan residents should not be forced to live with renewable energy industrial developments that infringe upon their communities. We should all vote no on Proposal 3.

Voice: DANIEL J. HANSFORD, City Manager and Director of Public Works/Essexville

t

Source:  www.mlive.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter