[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State: BP public involvement plan for Cape Vincent wind project is ‘inadequate’ 

Credit:  By JAEGUN LEE, TIMES STAFF WRITER, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2012, watertowndailytimes.com ~~

The state Public Service Commission has rejected BP Wind Energy’s public involvement program plan for the proposed Cape Vincent Wind Farm.

In a letter Wednesday, the state agency asked the company to broaden its outreach efforts and submit a revised plan.

“The plan does not adequately address many measures appropriate to a robust public involvement program,” the commission told BP. “The proposal concentrates to a large extent on those past outreach efforts, in the past two to seven years, rather than demonstrating how the applicant will elicit input from stakeholders for development of the revised, consolidated project.”

Earlier this year, BP acquired Acciona Wind Energy USA’s St. Lawrence Wind Farm and is planning a project that would generate up to 285 megawatts of electricity.

Initially, both projects were considered under Cape Vincent’s zoning laws, but BP decided to seek speedier approval of its project by asking a state siting board to consider the consolidated project under Article X.

Article X of the 2011 Power NY Act expedites the approval process of electric-generating facilities of 25 megawatts or higher and gives a state siting board the authority to override local zoning laws.

On Sept. 17, BP submitted its public involvement plan for community outreach to the state energy siting board, which is the first step in the process.

Cape Vincent officials have long criticized BP’s lack of communication between the local representatives and stakeholders who do not have a wind lease with the developer.

In response, Richard F. Chandler, director of business development for the Cape Vincent Wind Farm, has scheduled a meeting next week with local town and Planning Board representatives from Cape Vincent and Lyme.

While the public is not allowed to participate in the discussions at the open meeting, which will be held at 6 p.m. Tuesday at the Recreation Park on James Street, anti-wind residents and Article X protesters are planning a rally at 3:30 p.m., before the meeting.

The Public Service Commission told BP that it should not limit its efforts in soliciting input to a set of “narrow issues,” and should submit newer study reports that are site-specific instead of the “general” and “somewhat dated” documents it has provided.

The state agency also asked the developer to expand its study area to adjacent municipalities, including the town of Clayton and Wolfe Island, Ontario.

Representatives and residents of these neighboring communities “should be considered as potential stakeholders based on regional scale impacts of the proposed large-scale wind energy project,” PSC’s letter said.

The letter also said BP’s list of stakeholders should include the state Department of State’s Coastal Management Program staff, since the project would involve coastal zone resources – such as the Chaumont River area, which is in the proposed route of a transmission line connecting the wind farm to a substation in the town of Lyme.

Additionally, BP was asked to publish a tentative schedule for both public meetings and filings for its project application under Article X. This information should be made public online on the project website, in newsletters and at public workshops or open house meetings, the PSC said.

The company now has a month to consider the state’s recommendations and file a final public involvement program plan that explains how it has incorporated the recommendations or provides explanations if it decides not to.

Source:  By JAEGUN LEE, TIMES STAFF WRITER, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2012, watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky