LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Blow to the environment 

Credit:  The Southern Reporter | 19 October 2012 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk ~~

I could not believe my eyes when I opened last week’s Southern to read about Bill White calling for Galashiels to cash in on community funding available from wind farm projects.

Let’s put wind power into perspective. It is far more costly to produce “renewable” energy than conventional sources such as coal, gas and oil. The Renewables Obligation Certificate and Feed-in Tariff forces energy suppliers to buy electricity at higher cost than the wholesale price of electricity on the market.

Wind farm operators and landowners receive an extraordinary amount of money which comes chiefly from electricity bills, so it you and I who are paying.

The Duke of Roxburghe receives approximately £720,000 per annum from the 48 turbines on land that he owns, the energy company £34,058,880 and the subsidy given is a whopping £17,029,440.

Whilst wind turbines at face value are “carbon free”, the environmental damage caused in their construction is immense.

The foundations of wind turbines require the removal of huge quantities of earth which is replaced by many tons of carbon-emitting concrete. More concrete is used in the construction of roads to create access for carbon-emitting heavy industrial machinery such as cranes and digging equipment.

The CO2 emissions from coal-fired power stations could be halved by replacing them with gas-powered alternatives. It would take as many as 4,000 wind turbines rates at 1MW to replace the output of just one nuclear power station such as Sizewell B.

As at November 2011 there were 310 wind farms in the UK with 3,421 wind turbines between them.

Is this worth a paltry £63,000 and the destruction of our local environment?

Sherry M. Fowler

Magdala Terrace

Galashiels

Source:  The Southern Reporter | 19 October 2012 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky