LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Proposal to put turbines near Roman attraction ‘must be deplored’ 

Credit:  By Lichfield Mercury | Thursday, October 18, 2012 | www.lichfieldpeople.co.uk ~~

Plans to erect a pair of wind turbines on green belt land near Letocetum, the Roman site at Wall, have been lambasted by Lichfield Civic Society.

The proposal, submitted to Lichfield District Council by agent Bowler Energy on behalf of village farmer Stuart Ryman, is to site the turbines on his land at Manor Farm.

The application maintains there would be “minimal” impact on the landscape and Wall’s conservation area – a point backed up by an archeological report commissioned by Bowler.

Alan Thompson, secretary of the civic society’s planning advisory group, claims the machines would be “seriously dominant” and “a commanding presence”.

Residents have also protested against the proposal, leafleting homes in the area and setting up a website.

“The pleasingly rural nature of the site preserves something that has long gone in the vicinity and as such has to be treasured,” said Mr Thompson.

“Anything that disrupts this limited reminder of the recent past must be deplored, especially by any structure as aggressively novel as wind turbines at such a commanding, visually prominent position.”

Measured from the ground to the tip of a blade at its tallest, the white-painted 50kw turbines would have an overall height of 46m.

“To claim that the turbines will be “small” just because they are measured against monsters of 100 metres simply won’t do as an argument, as 100-metre turbines are rarely imposed on such an intimate landscape inland,” added Mr Thompson.

Bowler Energy’s application submits: “The turbines proposed would not create any negative impact upon amenity through noise, traffic or pollution and any visual impact in the wider landscape would be minimal.”

It maintains any adverse impact would be offset by the “wider economic and environmental benefit” of renewable energy. The archeological report concludes there would be a “moderate averse” effect on some listed buildings in Wall conservation area.

Source:  By Lichfield Mercury | Thursday, October 18, 2012 | www.lichfieldpeople.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky