[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

“Statoil must exit wind power”  

Credit:  Hilde Øvrebekk Lewis | Aftenbladet | 16 October 2012 | www.aftenbladet.no ~~

High costs and low profitability of projects means that Statoil should reconsider its commitment to wind power, experts say.

«The company is on the right track when it wants to focus strongly on the upstream petroleum industry, where it has its core competencies. The company now has so much to do that it is time to implement it consistently. Wind power seems to require too many resources in terms of return, and making oneself dependent on large subsidies is always risky,» oil analyst Hans Henrik Ramm tells publication Teknisk Ukeblad.

According to TU, the UK’s Sheringham Shoal wind power facility will not be profitable until well into the next decade.

Costly wind

Statoil wants an annual income of NOK 500 million (about GBP 54.6 million) a year from the project. Statoil has invested NOK 5 billion (roughly GBP 546.1 million) in the project and must also reckon with maintenance expenditures

«High wear and tear and frequent replacement can could make maintenance costs skyrocket,» says Øystein Noreng, professor in petroleum economics at the Norwegian Business School (BI), to TU.

Statoil and Statkraft are also planning a major new wind power project in the UK. At a cost of NOK 100 billion (approximately GBP 10.9 billion), Dogger Bank will consume considerable resources.

Press spokesperson Morten Eek at Statoil explains to TU that renewable projects are subject to the same conditions as oil and gas projects and must meet the same requirements regarding profitability.

Little faith in Dogger

TU further write that they have spoken with analysts who believe the return on wind power projects is significantly lower than for other projects in the company.

«Earnings depend on subsidies from the British government. This implies a political risk. It is an open question how long authorities in countries with weak economies will continue to support costly energy. The Dogger Bank project is hardly profitable with a required return of 15 percent,» declares Professor Øystein Noreng.

Oil analyst Hans Henrik Ramm also believes that the Dogger Bank project’s future is not ready.

«The Brits are even trying to shift focus from wind to gas. The current subsidy scheme is being phased out and is planned replaced with a system that is technology neutral,» he says.

Statoil’s official line is continued investment in wind power.

Source:  Hilde Øvrebekk Lewis | Aftenbladet | 16 October 2012 | www.aftenbladet.no

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.