[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Kinloch turbines are rejected 8-2 by councillors  

Credit:  Buchan Observer | 15 October 2012 | www.buchanobserver.co.uk ~~

Plans for the erection of two wind turbines at Kinloch, St Fergus, have been rejected by councillors.

The decision was made at last week’s meeting of the Buchan Area Committee at Peterhead’s Arbuthnot House.

The committee heard that the Ministry of Defence raised objections to the proposed turbines, measuring 79.6m in height, due to concerns about interference with radar equipment at RAF Buchan. The committee was also told the applicants tried to resolve the MoD’s concerns, but the MoD maintained their opposition to the plans.

Councillors were informed of recent turbine developments, including the erection of three turbines at Bruxley Hill.

Planning officer Wendy Forbes told the committee that a Planning Service Assessment would be required if approval was granted.

At the meeting, applicant Mr Chapman stated that the cumulative effect of the addition of two new turbines on RAF radar equipment would be insignificant.

He commented: “Our development is indistinguishable to what is already there. The MoD needs to be held to account.”

Mr Chapman said that the MoD had acted in a “high-handed and dismissive” manner in its approach to the development.

Councillor Alan Gardiner asked Mr Chapman about the role of MoD consultants, Kinetic. Mr Chapman replied: “Kinetic are there only to lay out the facts. The MoD have not looked at our case in as much detail as we have.”

During the question and answer session, Councillor Alan Buchan stated that he supported the MoD’s views and believed the application should be rejected.

However, Councillor Stephen Smith stated that the MoD had not addressed the specifics of the proposed development.

Following the debate, the committee rejected the planning application by 8-2 votes.

Source:  Buchan Observer | 15 October 2012 | www.buchanobserver.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.