[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Proposed wind farm causes controversy among Monticello residents  

Credit:  John Hollenhorst, Reporter | www.ksl.com Oct 12th, 2012 ~~

MONTICELLO, San Juan County – A battle has erupted over a proposal for southeastern Utah’s first wind farm.

It’s ironic because city leaders in Monticello aggressively promoted wind industry development. Now, some residents are shocked to find out just how close some of the giant wind turbines would be.

“You know, they like wind towers,” Mayor Doug Allen said of his constituents. “They like the ones you see in Spanish Fork. But I’m not so sure how much they’ll like them when they see them from their house every day.”

Officials of Wasatch Wind, the project developer, believe residents will accept the wind farm once it’s in place. Spokeswoman Michelle Stevens said, “At Spanish Fork many residents also had concerns prior to the wind farm being constructed and since the wind farm was constructed the city has not received complaints.”

Three separate companies have wind farm proposals on the table near Monticello. All three have obtained conditional use permits from San Juan County’s planning and zoning board.

Two of the proposed wind farms are a comfortable distance from town. But the third would be in grazing areas just outside city limits. Stevens said there will be 20 to 27 turbines. Each will be 400 to 500 feet high, depending on the design that is chosen.

The turbine closest to town would be about a mile from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ Monticello temple. Some wind towers might be within a half mile of some property lines at the northern of town, but Wasatch Wind said the closest city boundary will be approximately three-fourths of a mile from the nearest turbine.

For about 10 years, officials of Monticello and of San Juan County have been actively courting the wind farm industry. According to the mayor, they spent over $200,000 in federal funds to build meteorology towers and to collect data.

It proved what they already knew.

“There’s a lot of wind in Monticello,” Allen said.

He said the data collected over the years played a role in attracting several proposals from wind companies.

Bruce Adams, chairman of the San Juan County Commission, strongly supports the development of wind farms because he expects them to improve the tax base and provide a few jobs.

“I think wind would be a good thing for the county,” Adams said. He remains neutral on the current controversy because he expects opponents to appeal the conditional use permit to the county commission.

Some residents are comfortable with the idea of a wind farm close to home.

Georgia Rasmussen’s family leased ranchland to Wasatch Wind and her home is within a few hundred yards of a proposed wind turbine.

“I don’t mind their looks at all,” Rasmussen said. “I think it adds to the mountain (views), not take it away.”

In the center of the wind-farm site plan is a section of land nick-named the “donut hole.” It’s owned by nine separate landowners who have created the Northern Monticello Alliance to oppose the turbines.

“They’re surrounded completely by them,” Mayor Allen said. “I completely understand why that would be a concern to them.”

Using Google Earth, the NMA created graphics purporting to show what the wind farm will look like and how close it will be to the LDS temple in Monticello.

Wasatch Wind disputes those images, saying the scale is wrong and misleading.

Last week, the mayor called on Wasatch Wind to create its own images or models.

“It may lessen the opposition,” the mayor said. “It may increase the opposition. That’s a risk they should be willing to take.”

Stevens said the company has begun work on visual simulations following the city’s request.

“I don’t think anyone has denied that the turbines will be seen from some areas of Monticello,” Stevens said. “But from much or most of the populated areas of the city, the views of the wind farm would be obstructed by trees, other buildings and topography.”

Janet Ross, executive director of the Four Corners School of Outdoor Education is a strong supporter of the wind farm project and welcomes it as a clean energy project. But she wants a little more breathing room, especially for the non-profit group’s new Discovery Center under development at the north end of Monticello.

“I will continue to push for that because I think for aesthetics, for safety, for noise, it needs to be a little further away. And that’s what town people are concerned about too,” Ross said. “They don’t want flicker-shadows in their windows (from sunlight glinting off the windmills.) They don’t want ice-balls flung at them.”

Wasatch Wind originally told her the nearest windmill would be less than a half mile from the Discovery Center. But she believes the company is working hard to adjust their plans to accommodate such concerns, partly to make the development project a better sell to wind-farm builders.

“They want to sell a package to somebody that has happy neighbors,” Ross said. “That’s their goal or no one’s going to buy it.”

Wasatch Wind’s Michelle Stevens echoed that point.

“It’s also important to note that we’ve been in contact with these landowners for the last several months to find solutions that address their concerns.”

Source:  John Hollenhorst, Reporter | www.ksl.com Oct 12th, 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.