[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farms test New York’s home rule tradition 

Credit:  by David Sommerstein | North Country Public Radio | October 12, 2012 | www.northcountrypublicradio.org ~~

A company that wants to erect 48 wind turbines in the town of Clayton recently announced it would seek permitting through the state’s Article X, not the town council. Another company did the same thing in nearby Cape Vincent earlier this year.

Article X is a law passed last year. It gives a state board the authority to green light new power plants, including wind farms, possibly over local objections.

The town of Clayton has been embroiled in wind power issues since 2006. That’s when Spanish energy giant Iberdrola Renewables said it wanted to build 62 industrial-scale windmills on farmland there. Those turbines would be visible from the nearby St. Lawrence River.

The project was scaled down last year to 48, in part because Clayton passed a new zoning ordinance. It’s stricter about noise limits for the turbines, with bigger setbacks from roads and neighbors.

Now Iberdrola wants the state to take up its application, instead of the town council. In a letter to the town Planning Board, Iberdrola said it still considers its Clayton project “an excellent opportunity”, but it will seek a permit through the new Article X process.

And I’m OK with them progressing to Article X. It’s a state law.

Clayton town supervisor Justin Taylor says that’s fine, as long as the Article X siting board upholds the zoning law Clayton took years to make.

We believe it’s an ordinance that provides safety for our residents, and we hope that the Article X review board will take our ordinance into consideration because we feel it is a safe ordinance.

Article X is controversial because it attempts to strike a balance between local laws and beliefs on one hand, and the state’s enormous appetite for new sources of energy. Article X says it would override a local law only if that law’s “unreasonable”.

Speaking last August at Fort Drum, Governor Andrew Cuomo said it’s that “unreasonable” clause that distinguishes home rule from obstruction.

So you can’t say no to wind and no to solar and no to biomass and no to power plants and then say, I want jobs and I want a thriving economy. That’s the balance we have to reach.

He doesn’t care about us up here in the North Country.

Cindy Grant represents the Environmentally Concerned Residents of Clayton, a group opposed to wind power. She says state regulators on the Article X board are too far away to appreciate many local nuances.

Some people wouldn’t have even one clear horizon. They would step out of their homes and they would be surrounded by towers over 400 feet tall, 32 within a mile and a half of their home.

She says Clayton’s wind turbines ordinance doesn’t go far enough – because the town council was too worried it would overstep Article X’s notion of “reasonable”.

The whole project is subject to a very big unknown. Congress is debating whether to renew 12 billion dollars in production tax credits for wind power. President Obama supports them. Mitt Romney doesn’t. If that money’s not available, the wind farm may not be profitable enough to pursue at all.

Source:  by David Sommerstein | North Country Public Radio | October 12, 2012 | www.northcountrypublicradio.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky