[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Salmond’s defence of wind turbines reaps hurricane 

Credit:  By Cameron Brooks | The Press and Journal | 11 October 2012 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Alex Salmond has defended onshore windfarms, saying they do not spoil the countryside and actually make Scotland more attractive.

Campaigners branded the first minister “out of touch” last night – and warned that his stance on the issue would cost him victory in the independence referendum.

The SNP leader told delegates at a renewable energy conference in Edinburgh that he did not think there was any serious evidence that windfarms were incompatible with the landscape.

He insisted visitors were attracted to Scotland partly because of its green credentials and said offshore windfarms would be even more successful than onshore ones.

The Scottish Government – which has claimed tourists are largely indifferent to sensitively sited turbines – has set a target of generating 100% of electricity from renewables by 2020.

Highland anti-windfarm campaigner Lyndsay Ward said she was “stunned and horrified” by Mr Salmond’s “out-of-touch” stance.

“There is a burning question that people threatened by industrial windfarm development are asking themselves,” she said.

“If this government cannot be trusted to care for the environment, and protect people in rural communities from predatory windfarm developers, then how can it be trusted with independence?”

Ms Ward, who owns a B&B at Beauly, claimed some guests told her they were “absolutely horrified” by the prospect of the landscape being peppered with turbines and would think twice about visiting Scotland in the future.

Moray Council planning convener Douglas Ross said the first minister’s comments were “ridiculous”, “quite incredible” and illustrated how out of touch he was.

The Conservative councillor claimed the remarks would reinforce people’s fears the SNP was determined to erect turbines in inappropriate areas to meet green energy targets.

Mr Ross said: “These are ridiculous comments from the first minister and fly in the face of most comments I hear about wind turbine applications coming to the planning committee.

“Reasons for refusal can be on the grounds of visual intrusion on the landscape, so for the first minister to say they have no impact is quite incredible”

Peter Argyll, chairman of Aberdeenshire Council’s infrastructure services committee, said many residents across the region would disagree with Mr Salmond’s comments.

“People across Aberdeenshire are expressing concern about the impact turbines are having on lifestyle, landscape and way of life, which would appear to contradict the first minister’s views,” he said.

Murdo Fraser, convener of Holyrood’s economy, energy and tourism committee, said Mr Salmond’s “staggering defence” of windfarms would not be appreciated by communities across Scotland. “If turbines were such an aesthetic hit, why do they attract such widespread opposition?” the Conservative MSP said. Anti-windfarm campaigners are staging a march and rally in Perth on October 20.

Talking about turbines and the scenery, Mr Salmond said yesterday: “I don’t think there’s any serious evidence that they are incompatible.

“On the contrary, I think one of Scotland’s attractions is that we are a green country committed to renewable energy.”

Mr Salmond predicted offshore windfarms would be an even “greater success” than onshore developments – despite US billionaire Donald Trump’s vocal opposition.

“There’s no amount of foot-stamping that’s going to distract the Scottish Government from discharging its responsibilities.”

Source:  By Cameron Brooks | The Press and Journal | 11 October 2012 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky