[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Shumlin administration forms commission to assess siting process for industrial wind and other energy generation projects 

Credit:  by Andrew Stein | October 3, 2012 | vtdigger.org ~~

The Shumlin administration is reassessing how regulators involve the public in the permitting process for electricity projects.

On Tuesday, Gov. Peter Shumlin issued an executive order to form a five-person commission charged with evaluating and proposing ways to streamline the state’s permitting process for commercial energy generators and exploring how to better incorporate public participation into that process.

The decision comes after heated opposition to mountaintop industrial wind projects and lengthy permitting periods for solar projects.

According to Elizabeth Miller, commissioner of the department of public service, the Governor’s Energy Generation Siting Policy Commission was formed to update an outdated model of permitting energy generators.

She said that while the annual number of applicants for such permits has more than doubled over the past decade, rising from seven in 2001 to 17 in 2011, the permitting process has remained the same.

Furthermore, she said, numerous public officials, citizens and company representatives have complained that the process is lengthy, disjointed and lacks public participation. During an interview with VTDigger last week, gubernatorial candidate Randy Brock made the same complaint, adding that if he were governor he would centralize the permitting process.

Gabrielle Stevens, director of Renewable Energy Vermont, issued a statement on Wednesday that said she was “cautiously optimistic” the commission could improve the process.

“Vermont is one of the few states that has a permitting process with no end-date, resulting in projects that have taken years for approval,” she added.

The five commissioners appointed by Miller will assess the state’s process, analyze how other New England states process energy permits and propose recommendations for improving Vermont’s system. To do that, the commission is being asked to prepare a report that should explore such items as alternative dispute resolution, applied standards, public approval processes, methods for monitoring environmental impacts and permit coordination.

Miller said that while Vermont courts employ such measures as alternative dispute resolutions, Vermont’s Public Service Board – charged with issuing permits to energy generators – does not.

The report is due to the governor and several legislative committees by April 30, 2013.

The commissioners may elect a chair to lead the group, and Miller expects them to meet for the first time by the end of October. She said they will receive a reimbursement for mileage and per diem for their time, but did not know the exact amount of the per diem on Wednesday. She and Deborah Markowitz, secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR), are “ex officio” members of the commission.

The commission is comprised of:
• Scott Johnstone, who is the executive director of Vermont Energy Investment Corporation and former secretary of the ANR.
• Gaye Symington, who is the former speaker of the Vermont House.
• Louise McCarren, who was the first female chair of the Vermont Public Service Board.
• Jan Eastman, who is the former president of the Snelling Center for Government.
• Jim Matteau, who is the former director of the Windham Regional Commission.

Source:  by Andrew Stein | October 3, 2012 | vtdigger.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky