[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windfarm will ‘harm health of residents’ 

Credit:  By Duncan Bick | www.in-cumbria.com 3 October 2012 ~~

A care home boss claims a proposed windfarm could harm the health of her residents and force job losses.

Julie Walsh, proprietor of Virginia Lodge in Longtown, made the remarks on the first day of a public enquiry into a development at Hallburn Farm.

This is examining the rejection of an application to build six turbines there.

Each of these would be three times the height of Carlisle’s Civic Centre.

The application was submitted by energy firm REG Windpower.

Mrs Walsh’s business is within 1.5km (just under one mile) of one of the proposed structures. It provides long-term and respite care for the elderly.

She told the inquiry: “Many of my residents suffer from dementia and are unable to express their thoughts and feelings; I am here on their behalf.

“They would not wish their quality of life to be compromised by the turbines.”

She cited several studies from Britain, France and the USA, which stated that people living near windfarms suffered health problems.

Chief among these was being unable to sleep because of noise and flickering shadows as a result of the turbine blades.

She also said turbines increased stress, which can lead to cardiovascular problems, and that they would spoil the view around the home.

“As well as a home for 32 vulnerable, elderly adults we have also provided employment for over 20 years for the local community,” she added. “We currently employ 35 staff.

“If the windfarms were to have a detrimental effect on the residents and environment then residents would choose not to live here.

“We would then have no choice but to cut back on staff.”

The proposed scheme was originally rejected on four grounds; that ‘seismic noise’ from the turbines could interfere with nuclear test monitoring equipment at a Ministry of Defence (MoD) site at Eskdalemuir, near Langholm; the turbines would interfere with air traffic radar; effect on bird species and the Hadrian’s Wall heritage site.

The MoD, RSPB and English Heritagehave since withdrawn their objections. REG Windpower is now arguing that the turbines would not prevent the site in Langholm from operating effectively and should be allowed to go ahead.

Three others from Longtown at the Civic Centre yesterday spoke against the scheme.

Eileen Naude, of Esk Bank, was concerned about the impact on scenery and pointed out that abnormal load traffic accessing the farm would need to travel down Swanmoor Road, which is currently in a bad state of repair.

Karen Johnson, representing Arthuret Parish Council, echoed many of these points, adding that the organisation had spoken to many members of the public who were against the proposal. Several parish councillors were in the audience.

John Parrat of Oakwood, near Longtown, commented: “It may be that English Heritage and the RSPB have withdraw their objections but that does not mean residents are without their objections and we have a right to be heard.”

He criticised the effects the proposed development would have on the local environment.

The enquiry continues today.

Source:  By Duncan Bick | www.in-cumbria.com 3 October 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky