| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Report: Turbines hurt bird areas
Credit: Bruce Bell | www.intelligencer.ca 2 October 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A report released Tuesday morning by the Ontario environment commissioner hass called for new wind power rules to help protect birds and bats.
Gord Miller’s report said no new wind farms should be constructed in the province’s 70 designated Important Bird Areas (IBA). One of those IBAs is located on the south shore of the County.
Miller said there are two areas in which the government needs to improve guidelines to enhance protection for both birds and bats.
First, the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) should prohibit any new wind farms in the 70 “Important Bird Areas” (IBAs) in Ontario, said the report. IBAs are a network of sites … that have been identified, using internationally agreed criteria, as being important for the conservation of essential bird populations and migratory corridors,” he stated in the report. “MNR already acknowledges that location is a key factor in preventing bird deaths from wind turbines. It would just make sense to extend the logic to exclude new wind power development in IBAs, which represent some of the most significant bird habitat in the province and cover only about two per cent of Ontario.
“Second, the province needs to increase protection for migratory bats, which are the bats most at risk of being killed by wind turbines. These long-distance travellers account for 75 per cent of all wind turbine deaths for bats. But the MNR guidelines focus instead on non-migrating populations, with rules preventing turbines near caves, abandoned mines, buildings and barns where local bats hibernate.”
With a number of wind farm projects in the planning stages in Prince Edward County, opponents hope the government will use Miller’s report to put a halt to the proposed developments.
“We are very pleased with what he had to say in his report,” said PEC Field Naturalist Myrna Wood. “We approached him when he was the speaker at the Ontario Nature AGM in 2010 and a resolution was made calling for a moratorium on wind turbines in IBAs and it passed unanimously. What (Miller) had to say in his report was very important and I would think the government will have to pay attention to that.”
Wood pointed to two projects in the County – Gilead Power’s Ostrander Point (nine turbines) and wpd Canada’s White Pines Project (29 turbines), saying they would both impact birds and bats along the southern shores of Prince Edward County.
“All nine of the turbines for the Ostrander Point project are in the middle of the IBA and 12 of the wpd turbines are in there is well,” she said. “We’ve been saying for years this is not the place for these projects and now the the environment commissioner is supporting that.”
The County Sustainability Group has long supported wind energy in Prince Edward County and one of its members, Don Chisholm, said he feared Miller’s report was penned without enough information.
“I have a great deal of respect for Mr. Miller, he says a lot of very sensible things, however I fear he may not have had enough information and what he did have, was likely very one-sided,” said Chisholm. “When they talk about IBAs, they never talk about the new wineries, the new homes and all of the new development there, just wind turbines. If you look at statistics, the number of bird kills by turbines is almost trivial compared to these other things and I’m worried he didn’t consider that.”
Prince Edward-Hastings MPP Todd Smith said the report might mean the end of at least two of the developments in the County.
“I think Miller’s report is another third-party endorsement for the people in PEC who are trying to keep the turbines off the south shore and out of the IBA,” he said. “I personally feel the Ministry of Environment is looking very closely at both Ostrander Point and White Pines and with the mountain of evidence piling up, they will be looking at walking away from them because this (report) is one more bullet.”
Calls to Gilead Power and wpd Canada were not returned.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=28616 ]
