[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbine turbulence  

Credit:  The Canberra Times | www.canberratimes.com.au 2 October 2012 ~~

Jonathan Upson from Infigen Energy suggests my letter to the editor (September 22) on industrial wind turbines is dishonest (Letters, September 27). Yet he says the Ontario case example I used ”appeared to indicate that wind turbines caused harm to humans”. The quote from the conclusion to the case is unequivocal: ”This case has successfully shown that the debate should not be simplified to one about whether wind turbines can cause harm to humans. The evidence presented to the tribunal demonstrates that they can, if facilities are placed too close to residents.” Communities worldwide are waking up to the truth about the adverse health effects of industrial wind turbines. Moreover, the implementation of wind energy is conflict-ridden and wrecking the landscape. Almost daily, news reports from a variety of countries and more detailed analytical reports from experts are added to the National Wind Watch website (wind-watch.org).

One recent example is a press release from the Friends of Collector. They commissioned research by an independent market research company, which surveyed 238 households within a 10 kilometre radius of the proposed wind farm. It found that 81 per cent of residents do not wish the wind farm to proceed.

This is in marked contrast with the survey done for the wind company, which used a catchment area of 50 kilometre from the proposed wind farm. It purported to show that 68 per cent of respondents supported the wind farm. Who would you trust?

Dr Murray May, Cook

Jonathan Upson, of Infigen Energy (Letters, September 27) should examine his own standard of ”honest marketing”. He says wind energy has proven to be a safe source of electricity. If that was the case, then what was the Ontario court case about? The ”beauty” of the argument over health and wind turbines is in the eye of the beholder, much like a toothpick. If one believes they can go to sleep at night with a toothpick inserted into their bottom eyelid, then they should at least accept the very obvious problem: endless noise nuisance and rattling vibrations, perhaps won’t cause any health problems if one is still able to get a good night’s sleep.

George Papadopoulos, Yass, NSW

Source:  The Canberra Times | www.canberratimes.com.au 2 October 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.