[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

The real cost of turbine savings  

Credit:  By Curt Devlin | www.southcoasttoday.com 2 October 2012 ~~

A Sept. 5 story in The Standard-Times reported that the industrial wind turbines in Fairhaven saved the town $45,000 (“Summer turbine savings lower than expected due to wind speeds”), quoting Jeffrey Osuch, the town’s executive secretary, who conspired with Sumul Shah, to perpetrate this swindle, that “we are a little lower than we would expect.”

Actually, this is $20,000 less than the very minimum annual rate Osuch projected at Town Meeting, and $320,000 less than the maximum. But this isn’t the whole story. Fairhaven taxpayers will quietly lose millions from declining property value and the inevitable erosion of the tax base it will cause.

In sworn testimony to the Adams County Board in Illinois, Michael S. McCann, a state certified property appraiser who has studied the impact of turbines on property value across the country, reported that the value of properties within two miles of industrial turbines will decline by 25 to 40 percent. The homes closest to turbines often become unsellable at any price. (His complete testimony is online.) In light of this, take a moment to consider the real fiscal impact that this scheme Osuch has concocted will have in Fairhaven.

Due to his thoughtful planning, these turbines are located very close to the geographic center of the town. Google Earth shows that a two-mile radius includes roughly 90 percent of all the homes in Fairhaven, excluding only the more sparsely populated lower half of Sconticut Neck and West Island. A conservative estimate of, say, a 30 percent loss for a home valued at $250,000 dollars is a net loss of $75,000 in equity. This is a loss of years of accumulated equity for home values already depressed by the most adverse housing market in decades.

Based on this flagrant destruction of their property value, taxpayers in Fairhaven who live within two miles of these turbines would be eligible for tax abatement, and I strongly urge them to apply for one. If residents are given the abatement they legitimately deserve, one can reasonably expect the tax base to be eroded by about 27 percent overall. This would be loss of millions on the tax levy, harming even the lucky few who live far enough away from turbine ground zero. You can multiply this annual loss by 20, since Shah’s lease is for 20 years.

This loss will not include the costs to process mass tax abatement or the potential legal costs to all parties if legitimate abatements are denied. More importantly, it does not include the incalculable impact to the health and safety of residents and the legal liabilities for them, which will fall exclusively on the town as public health deteriorates.

The turbine manufacturer, Sinovel, is Chinese; it has proved to be judgment-proof in U.S. courts. Fairhaven Wind is a limited liability corporation. This is a corporate legal architecture designed to fold like a cheap suit at the first sign of trouble. That will leave only the Town of Fairhaven to face the music. Taxpayers will lose again. If the town loses the existing suit, brought by the residents of Little Bay for illegally siting these turbines, it will become a sitting duck for health liability suits.

If you assume that Fairhaven was actually purchasing $180,000 worth of power this year at Shah’s rate of 7.43 cents per kWH, you would discover that the same power could have been purchased from NStar at the small commercial rate of 6.686 cents. The town would have saved an additional $16,000 per year. You can see for yourself at the NStar calculator online. In other words, the Town of Fairhaven is being gouged by its own tenant, its own cohort.

Now that you now the rest of the story, feel free to celebrate the pure fiscal genius that Jeff Osuch has brought to Fairhaven this summer, and for the next 20 years. Perhaps Osuch, in his uniquely soporific style, will provide us with a more detailed and complete accounting of the true fiscal impact at Town Meeting this spring – but you shouldn’t hold your breath waiting.

In the meantime, if you are trying to sell your home, and the market analysis for it turns out to be 30 percent or 40 percent lower than you expected, you will know who to thank for all your summer savings. We are now living in what Stephen Ambrose has termed a Public Health Sacrifice Zone.

Curt Devlin lives in Fairhaven.

Source:  By Curt Devlin | www.southcoasttoday.com 2 October 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.