LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Vote against energy proposal 

Credit:  The Oakland Press | theoaklandpress.com 20 September 2012 ~~

Proposal 3 on the November election ballot regarding renewable energy mandates – often referred to as “25 x 25” – is nothing more than a pipe dream that will cost us dearly if it passes. It will require that 25 percent of Michigan’s energy be produced from renewable sources, such as biomass, hydro, solar and wind power by the year 2025. This is a lofty goal but it is filled with pitfalls and promises that cannot be kept. One such promise is the stipulation that any energy price increase be capped at 1 percent.

The cost of reaching this goal is estimated to be up to $12 billion. No matter what the politicians promise, it is always we the consumers who will pay for it in the end, in this case with higher utility bills. The 1 percent cap on utility rates is an empty promise that we are being asked to blindly believe and accept. I’ve been down that road before. If “25 x 25” becomes law, we will see utility rate increases for years to come. What’s more, it is a cost increase that will be baked into our constitution, so it will be a permanent money flow that can only increase as need requires.

“25 x 25” sounds nice on the surface but, in reality, it is not a well thought out idea and should go back to the drawing board before it is foisted on the people of Michigan. Sometimes it is the public that has to bring reason and sanity to the fore. This is one of those times. I urge you to vote “no” on Proposal 3 this November.

DONN WOLF

Farmington Hills

Source:  The Oakland Press | theoaklandpress.com 20 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky