[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Vote against energy proposal  

Credit:  The Oakland Press | theoaklandpress.com 20 September 2012 ~~

Proposal 3 on the November election ballot regarding renewable energy mandates – often referred to as “25 x 25” – is nothing more than a pipe dream that will cost us dearly if it passes. It will require that 25 percent of Michigan’s energy be produced from renewable sources, such as biomass, hydro, solar and wind power by the year 2025. This is a lofty goal but it is filled with pitfalls and promises that cannot be kept. One such promise is the stipulation that any energy price increase be capped at 1 percent.

The cost of reaching this goal is estimated to be up to $12 billion. No matter what the politicians promise, it is always we the consumers who will pay for it in the end, in this case with higher utility bills. The 1 percent cap on utility rates is an empty promise that we are being asked to blindly believe and accept. I’ve been down that road before. If “25 x 25” becomes law, we will see utility rate increases for years to come. What’s more, it is a cost increase that will be baked into our constitution, so it will be a permanent money flow that can only increase as need requires.

“25 x 25” sounds nice on the surface but, in reality, it is not a well thought out idea and should go back to the drawing board before it is foisted on the people of Michigan. Sometimes it is the public that has to bring reason and sanity to the fore. This is one of those times. I urge you to vote “no” on Proposal 3 this November.

DONN WOLF

Farmington Hills

Source:  The Oakland Press | theoaklandpress.com 20 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter