[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge says recount confirms outcome in Progressive governor primary 

Credit:  Written by DAVE GRAM | Associated Press | www.burlingtonfreepress.com 17 September 2012 ~~

MONTPELIER – A Vermont judge said Monday a recount in the Progressive Party primary for governor appeared to confirm party Chairwoman Martha Abbott’s victory over environmental group leader Annette Smith.

Judge Robert Bent of the Washington Superior Court said he would review six disputed ballots and issue a final ruling on Tuesday, but as of Monday, the recount had Abbott ahead of Smith by a margin wide enough that the disputed ballots likely won’t matter: 381 to 340.

Bent’s announcement came during an interim court hearing known as a status conference on Smith’s request for a recount.

Meanwhile, Smith said she would be a write-in candidate in the general election.

“There clearly is a need for a candidate to be a candidate of the people. And that’s what I obviously am. I am not a politician,” Smith said.

The Danby resident is executive director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment. That group formed in the late 1990s to fight a natural gas pipeline extension and power plants in Rutland and Bennington. Since then, the group has been involved in other issues, including organizing opposition to large-scale wind power projects and using the additive chloramine in public water supplies.

Smith has drawn support from opponents to mountaintop wind towers, critics of chloramine and opponents to the use by utilities of digital, wireless smart meters on homes and businesses.

Abbott, an Underhill resident who has a tax preparation business in Burlington, appeared to have won the Aug. 28 primary as of that night by a vote of 371-354. Mistakes uncovered in the following days narrowed that margin to one vote, 371 for Abbott and 370 for Smith, and Smith asked for a recount.

County clerks in Vermont’s 14 counties led recounts that took Thursday and half of Friday. Monday was the first announcement of results from that recount, which widened Abbott’s apparent margin of victory.

Abbott announced before the primary that she would withdraw her candidacy and not run in the November election, instead urging fellow Progressives to support the re-election of incumbent Democratic Gov. Peter Shumlin.

It’s the second election cycle in a row that Abbot has run in the primary and then withdrawn, a strategy designed to prevent anyone else for winning the party’s nomination and then running in the general election under its banner. Abbott and other party leaders say they want to focus on winning legislative seats rather than seeking the top job.

Also Monday, the state’s director of elections said she and her boss, Secretary of State Jim Condos, would push in the coming legislative session to get Vermont’s state-office primary moved from late August to May or June. Its presidential primary is in March.

Election officials have scrambled two cycles in a row to get a recount completed in time to meet a federal deadline for getting general election ballots printed and mailed to military and other overseas voters.

Elections Director Kathleen Scheele said the rush to count primary ballots and confirm results sets the system up for errors.

“When staff work 75 or 80 hours (in a week), that’s when mistakes happen,” Scheele said.

Source:  Written by DAVE GRAM | Associated Press | www.burlingtonfreepress.com 17 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky