LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Anger growing at wind farm plans 

Credit:  By Rick Burin | Ripon Gazette | www.ripongazette.co.uk 14 September 2012 ~~

Campaigners are stepping up their fight against plans for a new wind farm to the west of Harrogate.

Developer Kelda Water Services has submitted an application for seven turbines off Penny Pot Lane, while two other potential developments could take the total number of turbines around Knabs Ridge to 36.

A spokesman for the Save the Dales group, set up in opposition to the plans, told the Advertiser: “A lot of anger has been coming out.

“It’s really starting to dawn on people just where these things will actually be seen from. This would have a tremendous and wide-ranging impact on the beautiful landscape around the site and on the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

“The most definite effect would be in relation to tourism. It would impact on the jewels in the crown of the area: the various heritage sites, ranging from John of Gaunt’s Castle to Little Almscliffe and How Hill, which is part of Fountains Abbey and Studley Royal.”

The group has highlighted what Kelda calls the “zone of theoretical visibility” – an area covering up to 30km from where the turbines could be seen, including Harewood House, Ripley Castle, the Grade I listed St Wilfrid’s Church in Harrogate, and Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal, the area’s only World Heritage Site.

“If this was to go ahead, it would set the most dangerous precedent possible, opening the door to many other locations in the AONB and Dales,” the Save the Dales spokesman added.

“This isn’t just about the seven turbines, it’s about the 21 which could follow if this is approved, which would be absolutely devastating for the area.

“We’re privileged to live in this area and it has to be preserved for future generations.”

The group has also been critical of Kelda’s consultation process, saying the information leaflet sent to residents was substandard and questioning the amount of energy the 100ft turbines would actually produce.

Donna Kingett, from Kelda, said: “As a group, we are looking at renewable energy sources, and wind is one of those elements.

“This is a suitable site, predominantly because there’s a good profile of wind, and there is already a wind farm there.”

She added that the company had held four public meetings about the proposals and stood by the figures in its literature.

Kelda’s application for a further 17 turbines at nearby Haverah Park is being submitted later, as reports are needed about the effect on birds.

There are currently eight turbines at Knabs Ridge, which were erected in 2008. In addition to Kelda’s plans, another firm, Tapar, is looking at the possibility of a further four.

Harrogate and Knaresborough MP Andrew Jones said he was opposed to on-shore wind farms in principle, and the possibility of 36 turbines even more so.

Kelda argues that the suitability of the site has been established by its inclusion in Harrogate Council’s Planning and Climate Change study, and by the existing turbines, installed after a successful appeal to the government.

Members of the public and interested parties have until next Saturday, September 22, to comment on the proposals, which will be determined by Harrogate Council planners.

To view the application, go to www.harrogate.gov.uk, click on Public Access and enter reference 12/02939/EIAMAJ.

Source:  By Rick Burin | Ripon Gazette | www.ripongazette.co.uk 14 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky