[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Appeal launched over West Lancashire council’s rejection of wind turbine plans at Walkers site 

Credit:  Sep 13 2012 by Rob Pattinson, Ormskirk Advertiser | www.osadvertiser.co.uk ~~

An appeal has been lodged over the council’s decision to reject plans to install a wind turbine at the Walkers Factory.

West Lancashire Council’s planning committee rejected the scheme in March.

But Walkers’ parent company PepsiCo has now decided to appeal the decision to the Planning Inspectorate.

In a letter to the council, Simon Ely, manufacturing director for PepsiCo, said the turbine was part of their plans to contribute to the “fight against climate change” and would allow them to “grow in the right way”.

He said the appeal would ask the planning inspector to reconsider the conclusions from the planning committee that the turbine would create “unacceptable visual impairment” and whether it gave “sufficient weight” to national planning guidance, under which officers recommended approval should be granted.

He said: “We were pleased to see the planning officer’s report reflected our view that there would not be a detrimental impact issues such as wildlife and residential amenity, and that the turbine’s output would be well within acceptable noise levels.”

West Lancashire Council’s planning department received 714 letters of objection to the original scheme, and campaigner Alan Horridge said: “We’re very disappointed [with the appeal]. When we had the hearing for the initial application there was massive objection against the plans. People wrote letters, sent petitions. I wrote to them with a series of concerns after the decision in case they were planning to appeal.

“They finally wrote back to me four weeks ago saying they hadn’t made a decision but obviously now they have. It’s ridiculous to say the council got it wrong.

“We hope the planning inspector will listen to the councillors who were acting on behalf of the people, democracy still has a place and we hope that will be shown.”

Source:  Sep 13 2012 by Rob Pattinson, Ormskirk Advertiser | www.osadvertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky