LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Appeals against turbines have more than trebled 

Credit:  The Press and Journal | 12 September 2012 ~~

The number of appeals against council rejections of windfarm planning applications has more than trebled in the past year.

The number of cases handled by the Directorate of Planning and Environmental Appeals shot up by 353% from 15 in 2010-11 to 53 in 2011-12.

A leading north-east firm of planning consultants said the figures could indicate local authorities were taking a “harder line”.

But council planners said there was no toughening of attitudes and the increase was because of the flood of new applications.

Last month, the Scottish Government rejected Moray Council’s call for a moratorium on new applications while a public consultation was carried out.

Council planning chairman Douglas Ross said the higher number of appeals reflected the rise in planning applications and subsequent pro-rata refusals.

“It may also be the case that applicants feel there is a softening in the approach to wind turbines from the Scottish Government, given their ambition to have 100% of energy from renewable sources by 2020,” he said.

“So maybe it’s not the planning committees which take a harder view, but the government being seen as an easy option to overturn a decision taken by councillors.”

Aberdeenshire Council’s infrastructure chairman Peter Argyle – who also wanted a moratorium – said the increase was the “inevitable consequence” of the sheer number of applications.

“The more applications there are the more issues of cumulative impact on communities, landscape and amenities,” he said.

“It is more likely that applications could be refused because of these issues. If that can be interpreted as a hardening of attitude, I would not go that far.”

Robert Murphy, of planning consultants Smith Gore, said the number of appeals over windfarms was second only to appeals by householders.

“This suggests that more developers are bringing forward more schemes for planning that are subsequently being refused, and could also indicate a harder line among planning committees,” he said.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “An applicant’s right to appeal a planning authority decision is enshrined in law.”

Source:  The Press and Journal | 12 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky