LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Seymour Johnson opposes wind turbine plan 

Credit:  By Kristin Davis - Staff writer | Air Force Times | www.airforcetimes.com 10 September 2012 ~~

A plan to put 49 wind turbines on 11,000 acres near Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, N.C., has triggered opposition from the only F-15E Strike Eagle training squadrons in the Air Force.

The proposed wind farm would stand within 15 nautical miles of military training routes, the base said in a news release Monday, placing “dozens of 498-foot obstacles within a route where thousands of low-altitude, high speed military training sorties are flown every year.”

Seymour Johnson houses four F-15E squadrons, which make up nearly half of the service’s Strike Eagle fleet. F-15E pilots receive basic qualification and requalification training at the base, in the city of Goldsboro. The squadrons also conduct transition training for all pilots and weapon systems officers who fly the Strike Eagle.

The fighter jets fly at altitudes as low as 500 feet, the base said in the news release. The wind turbines, which could rise to nearly 500 feet, pose a safety risk to pilots, especially at night, the base said. Further, the wind farm could interfere with military radars used to track F-15E practice runs.

The Air Force has posted a preliminary wind turbine impact analysis on the base’s website, www.seymourjohnson.af.mil.

The proposed wind farm, called the Pantego Wind Energy project, requires both military and environmental approval, according to the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association.

Source:  By Kristin Davis - Staff writer | Air Force Times | www.airforcetimes.com 10 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky