[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Answer is blowing in the wind, at a price  

Henry Lee, a Harvard University environment and energy professor who used to be energy chief for the state of Massachusetts, said there a few problems with the idea of wind powering the world. The first is the cost is too high. Furthermore, all the necessary wind turbines would take up too much land and require dramatic increases in power transmission lines, he said. Jerry Taylor, an energy and environmental analyst at the conservative Cato Institute, said the lack of economic reality in the studies made them “utterly irrelevant.” Dr Caldeira acknowledged that the world would need to change dramatically to shift to wind. “To power civilisation with wind turbines, I think you're talking about a couple wind turbines every square mile,” Dr Caldeira said. “It's not a small undertaking.”

Credit:  AP | www.theaustralian.com.au 11 September 2012 ~~

Earth has more than enough wind to power the entire world, at least technically, according to two new studies.

But the research looks only at physics, not finances. Other experts note it would be too costly to put up all the necessary wind turbines and build a system that could transmit energy to all consumers.

The studies, by two different US science teams, calculate that existing wind turbine technology could produce hundreds of trillions of watts of power. That’s more than 10 times what the world now consumes.

Wind power doesn’t emit heat-trapping gases like burning coal, oil and natural gas. But there have been questions, raised in earlier studies, about whether physical limits would prevent the world from being powered by wind.

The new studies, done independently, showed potential wind energy limits wouldn’t be an issue.

Money would be.

“It’s really a question about economics and engineering and not a question of fundamental resource availability,” said Ken Caldeira, a climate scientist at the Palo Alto, California, campus of the Washington-based Carnegie Institution for Science. He is a co-author of one of the studies; that one appeared yesterday in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Dr Caldeira’s study finds wind has the potential to produce more than 20 times the amount of energy the world now consumes. Right now, wind accounts for just a tiny fraction of the energy the world consumes. So to get to the levels these studies say is possible, wind production would have to increase dramatically.

If there were 100 new wind turbines for every existing one, that could do the trick, says Mark Jacobson, a Stanford University professor of civil and environmental engineering.

Professor Jacobson wrote the other study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It shows a slightly lower potential in the amount of wind power than Dr Caldeira’s study. But he said it still would amount to far more power than the world now uses is or is likely to use in the near future.

Professor Jacobson said startup costs and fossil fuel subsidies prevent wind from taking off. The cheap price of natural gas, for one thing, hurts wind development, he added.

Henry Lee, a Harvard University environment and energy professor who used to be energy chief for the state of Massachusetts, said there a few problems with the idea of wind powering the world. The first is the cost is too high.

Furthermore, all the necessary wind turbines would take up too much land and require dramatic increases in power transmission lines, he said.

Jerry Taylor, an energy and environmental analyst at the conservative Cato Institute, said the lack of economic reality in the studies made them “utterly irrelevant.”

Dr Caldeira acknowledged that the world would need to change dramatically to shift to wind.

“To power civilisation with wind turbines, I think you’re talking about a couple wind turbines every square mile,” Dr Caldeira said. “It’s not a small undertaking.”

[rest of article available at source]
Source:  AP | www.theaustralian.com.au 11 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter