News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Questions, not comments  

Credit:  By Ed Barber | The Newport Daily Express | newportvermontdailyexpress.com 5 September 2012 ~~

BRIGHTON, VT – The Select Board, town officials, interested parties, and John Soininen from Seneca Mountain Wind (SMW) met Tuesday evening to hash out the format for an October 3rd meeting for both sides to educate the public about commercial wind.
The meeting will be scheduled from 6 to 9 p.m. and will start with 30-minute presentations from up to 12 panelists, half selected by Seneca Mountain Wind and the other half by the Brighton Ridge Protectors.
Following the presentation, the floor will be opened to the public, who will be limited to asking questions of the panelists but will not be permitted to make statements for or against the project.
Soininen’s position is the meeting should be for people to ask questions of the “experts” on the panel and not to state a personal opinion. Moderator Tom Donnellan agreed, stating, “We need to let people educate each other, but this should not be a time to vent.”
Those permitted to ask questions are residents of the town, voters, and taxpayers, which will allow non-resident property owners to be able to participate at the meeting.
Whether the publicly warned hearing is presented as a “panel discussion” or a “town meeting” was dismissed by Donnellan, who advised the select board that, regardless, the same open meeting rules apply. Donnellan also asked the select board to establish written ground rules he must enforce, including a time limit on questions and answers.
Prior to the Tuesday meeting, Seneca Mountain Wind sent letters to the select boards in Newark and Brighton and to the Board of Governors for the Unified Towns and Gores of Essex County. The letters state that the developer will “respect the official position of the community as to whether they are willing to host a wind power project (once proposed).”
Jack Kenworthy, manager of SMW, LLC, states, “SMW is submitting this letter to this Board to demonstrate our willingness to commit to the outcome of a properly warned, town-wide ballot vote, once a wind project has been proposed and the full accurate details discussed.”
Currently SMW has applied for a Certificate of Public Good before the Public Service Board for the placement of four temporary meteorological towers to gather data in two towns and one gore. The proposed project could involve as many as 35 turbines, which can provide power to approximately 45,000 homes.
SMW, LLC, is a joint venture between Eolian Renewable Energy, LLC, and Nordex-USA, Inc., a turbine manufacturer and project developer. The company has 4,700 turbines operating in 38 countries.

Source:  By Ed Barber | The Newport Daily Express | newportvermontdailyexpress.com 5 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.