News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

What if wind farm is abandoned? Company offers to set aside $13,000 to help with costs  

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI | www.saukvalley.com 5 September 2012 ~~

DIXON – A proposed three-county wind farm project will cost hundreds of millions of dollars, its project manager said Tuesday.

Each turbine would cost about $2 million, said John Martin of Ireland-based Mainstream Renewable Power. Fifty-three are planned for southwestern Lee County.

One issue is Mainstream’s plan for the possibility that it later decommissions the project.

In its decommissioning plan, Mainstream said it would set aside about $13,000 for such a process in Lee County. That compares to the more than $6 million the company’s expert said it would cost to bring down the wind farm. But that expert’s report maintains that the salvage value of the turbines would cover nearly that entire cost, an assertion others dispute.

Some residents are pushing for wind energy companies to put up far more money beforehand for instances when they abandon wind farms. They say they don’t want decaying albatrosses marring the landscape.

Martin was asked about the $13,000 during Tuesday’s hearing of the Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals, which is considering Mainstream’s proposal.

“That’s for discussion purposes,” he said, adding that the decommissioning plan was a draft.

Ultimately, he said, the County Board would approve the final plan shortly before building permits are issued. That would be after the public hearing process has ended.

Attorney Rick Porter, who is representing Hamilton Township and landowners near the proposed turbines, questioned whether a public hearing would be held on the plan.

Martin said that would be up to the County Board.

“The County Board is well-suited to handle the issue,” he said.

Porter also cross-examined Martin on studies on the effects of noise and shadow flicker on neighbors. He said the company said in its application that it would get third-party experts to examine those issues and submit their resumes and work experience to the county beforehand.

Porter said that wasn’t done and asked Martin why.

“I don’t have an answer for that,” he said.

Minutes later, Porter brought up the application’s promise again. Mainstream’s attorney, Doug Lee, protested, saying that pledge applied to later studies on noise and shadow flicker.

“You’re making stuff up,” Porter told Lee.

The hearing’s facilitator, Tim Slavin, a retired judge, chastised the attorneys.

Porter said one of the experts belonged to wind energy trade groups, including Women of Wind Energy.

“Would you agree the scientist is not neutral?” Porter asked Martin.

Lee objected, and Slavin stopped that line of questioning.

For 2 1/2 hours, Porter cross-examined Martin. Because it is a public hearing, all those attending – more than 30 did Tuesday – have the right to ask questions as well.

The hearing process likely will continue for months. The next one is Sept. 18.

Last month, the Whiteside County Board approved nine turbines in the far southeastern area of the county. Bureau County is still holding hearings.

To attend

The Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. Sept. 18 on the third floor of the Old Lee County Courthouse, 112 E. Second St. in Dixon. The meeting is expected to last 2 1/2 hours.

The board will resume its public hearing for Mainstream Renewable Power’s application for turbines in the southwestern area of the county.

For an agenda for this meeting, minutes from past meetings, or more information, go to www.leecountyil.com or call 815-288-5676.

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI | www.saukvalley.com 5 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.