LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME




[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines plan at Eye refused over concern for bat colony 

Credit:  Eastern Daily Press | www.edp24.co.uk 31 August 2012 ~~

An application for three wind turbines has been rejected amid fears over the impact they could have on a colony of bats.

Mid Suffolk District Council officers had recommended the application for the wind turbines in Kings Farm, Cranley Road, Eye for approval.

But Stuart Gemmill, chairman of the planning referrals committee, said the council had decided to change the application’s recommendation to refusal, after there were concerns that an ecological survey had not been carried out and there were worries about the effect the turbines could have on a bat colony.

The joint owner of Kings Farm, Sheila Havers, said she only found out about the council’s change of position when she arrived at the meeting.

Mrs Havers said she thought the plans had gone to the referrals committee because of concerns, which were later quashed, that noise from the turbines could affect dogs at the boarding kennels business at the farm.

Mr Gemmill, district councillor for Stradbroke and Laxfield said he had proposed to defer the plans at the meeting to allow time for the ecological survey to be carried out.

He said: “I think the concern, historically is that there was a colony of bats in the area that could be in the perimeter of the wind turbines so they needed a survey done.”

But Mrs Havers said that although there had been a colony of bats on the 250-acre farm a few years ago they had now disappeared.

The second reason the committee gave for rejecting the wind turbines, which would be nearly 18 metres tall, was because of their concern over the visual impact the turbines would have on the countryside.

“Members are concerned about the number of wind turbines,” said Mr Gemmill.

“We keep getting applications for them coming in every week. I think they are difficult applications to make a decision on – there are so many. I think a lot of people are not very keen on them – but you need to provide reasons to turn them down.”

Fifteen applications for wind turbines in the Eye area and the nearby parishes of Occold, Redlingfield and Denham have been submitted to the council in the past two years.

Source:  Eastern Daily Press | www.edp24.co.uk 31 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tags: Victories, Wildlife


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky