[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Should the proposed wind farm get the green light? – No, says Stuart Young  

Credit:  By Stuart Young | www.scotsman.com 31 August 2012 ~~

Contrary to popular myth, electricity generation by coal and gas is not subsidised at all by taxpayers or consumers, while subsidy for renewables is expected to total £1.78 billion in 2012

That will be paid for by 66 million people in the UK – which means £27 per head.

For years, the wind industry’s propaganda machine has been pulling the wool over people’s eyes, pretending green energy is free, yet deserving of ever more subsidy. Every time electricity bills rise, supporters of wind point the finger at fossil-fuel prices, insisting wind subsidies can’t be to blame because all forms of electricity generation are subsidised. This is a blatant untruth. Oil and gas receive no meaningful subsidy, while wind will cost consumers more than £1.8bn in covert subsidy by the end of the year.

Wind energy is a flawed technology – take away the subsidy, and no-one would build any more turbines.

Consumers have to fund the oncosts of wind energy. This means the ever-increasing costs of expanding and upgrading the grid to collect the energy from thousands of turbines spread across the UK, plus the costs of maintaining and developing base-load generation (for when the wind doesn’t blow).

More renewables means more guaranteed profiteering for the wind energy firms and their hangers-on, but, for the rest of us, it means ever higher bills, fuel poverty and an economy crippled by some of the highest energy prices in Europe.

The level of subsidy required to induce investment in offshore wind farms cannot be sustained. When public outrage forces politicians to reduce subsidy for offshore wind and it become less profitable and, as the years go by, more expensive to maintain, then it is quite conceivable they will simply be abandoned.

If this wind farm gets planning consent, it is essential the Scottish Government ensures guaranteed and ring-fenced funds are put in place for their eventual decommissioning or the public will be fleeced once more by experts funded by government – ie, us – to remove them.

Stuart Young is an independent consultant for Communities Against Turbines Scotland and chairman of Caithness Windfarm Information Forum.

[Click here to view a presentation by Stuart Young about the electric bill.]

Source:  By Stuart Young | www.scotsman.com 31 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Video

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.